• We are a multilingual website again. Read the notice about this.
  • Understand AI use at MyPTSD: all AI use is explained in our AI help page. AI use is by choice here. It exists if you want it, but does nothing unless you choose to use it.

Is Moral Nihilism A Form Of Dissociation / Stockholm Syndrome?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Klo

Silver Member
When I talk about moral nihilism, I'm not talking about religious debates or anything along those lines. I'm talking about people who try to claim that there is no such thing as right and wrong. Once in a while I encounter one of these people, and they always seem to think they are so enlightened and above everyone else. As someone who has experienced sadistic abuse at the hands of another, I probably feel a little emotionally "triggered" by such things, but it also always goes the same way.

First I test how much they really believe what they are saying, by asking them for their thoughts on child sexual abuse / assault, I really just go right for the throat with it because I don't want to waste a bunch of time arguing about things that are more in the grey area, I really want to put their theory to the test. So I ask for their views on that and if they think it is morally right or wrong, or neither.

And pretty much every time the person just emotionally explodes. They become extremely defensive and angry, and try to backtrack on their previous stance, to the point that they start contradicting themselves. They might offer up excuses such as, "Child rapists don't think they are doing anything wrong, it's a matter of perspective."

As another example, I even encountered one of them today who tried to convince me that slave owners don't free their slaves only because the slave owners believe that the slaves couldn't survive without guidance - i.e. that ultimately the slave owner has benevolent intentions. For the record, I really disagree with this.

At that point I try to explain to them what I have learned about psychopaths, as far as how they are fully capable of understanding right and wrong, and know when they are hurting others - they just don't care. I try to offer some work by Robert Hare as a starting point.

The conversation tends to just keep devolving until the other person is reduced to ad hominem attacks, self-contradicting and is veering all over the place, and I just feel like some e-bully troll who has upset someone with nothing productive coming out of it. Massive sigh.

But later when I'm not so worked up about it and am calm enough to be a little more empathetic, I wonder if it stems from people who have been mistreated and are in denial, dissociation or some flavor of Stockholm Syndrome. Because at the end of the day, they seem to feel very strongly that they not be considered morally neutral after all, but it's like there is an intense inner conflict as far as wanting to make excuses for perpetrators. I figure this must be coming from somewhere.

Because I also figure that if they themselves were just predatory types, they wouldn't get so terribly defensive and emotional, they would probably just do what most edgelord internet trolls do and try to provoke further, with statements like, "Yep nothing wrong with child rape," just to try to get a rise out of people. Instead these people seem actually be quite emotionally sensitive and even confused.

Part of me wonders if maybe half the reason I feel so compelled to debate them, is because I see them as vulnerable, like their views will make them more vulnerable to predatory people. "It's not my fault, feel sorry for me," could work well on those people. But in the end all that happens is that they freak out and I feel like an ass.
 
@Klo, two things came to mind while reading your post... do you get the chance to ask them where their beliefs started? Which would probably answer some of your questions..
And the other was, just stop !!! How you feel about yourself at the end of the day is much more important than having a debate about nihilism ... just my two cents...
 
do you get the chance to ask them where their beliefs started?

In some of the cases, but I never get a real answer. It just falls back on how they don't believe that anyone ever tries to hurt anyone else, that's always misunderstanding. I've never received an explanation as to why they believe this, though.

And the other was, just stop !!! How you feel about yourself at the end of the day is much more important than having a debate about nihilism ... just my two cents...

Yeah it's probably not the best use of my time, but I feel drawn to debating it with them when I happen to see them and their views pop up somewhere (happens on mental health sites once in a while, as well, so not like I was looking for the argument).

It feels important to me because it's something I have personally struggled with my whole life, trying to come to terms with how my parents (especially my father) acted. I've even had therapists disagree and send mixed messages. Some have tried to convince me that my father just didn't know any better and couldn't help himself. This falls apart in my mind very fast because I hold myself to different standards. I went through many bad things and lacked proper moral guidance growing up, but that is no excuse for me to treat others abusively. I must hold onto this "truth" of mine in order motivate myself to not become that which hurt me. I need to believe that I can break the cycle, that I am not just a product of my upbringing and that I am in control of how I treat others. I feel this is the only hope to not be an abuser, myself. But I cannot hold this simultaneously with thoughts of, "My father couldn't help himself, he had no control, he was just confused." It can create some cognitive dissonance issues, even.

So my knee-jerk reaction when I see people trying to claim that there is no such thing as right and wrong, is to suspect them of being perpetrators in "grooming" mode, trying to convince people that you can hurt others, even children, and its not really "wrong". But then part of me also wonders if there is some sort of mutual understanding, on a deeper level, that is possible. Could these people also have been abused and conditioned to believe such things? Could they also be struggling to make sense of abuse they experienced?
 
I used to be big into moral nihilism and I definitely have issues with power dynamics. My father was a bad man, from where I'm standing.

But my therapist has also tried to get me to realize that he was probably a victim too, and is hurt in his own way. Hurt people hurt people.

It's very difficult to empathize with your abuser, especially when your abuser played on that empathy to keep you victimized. I struggle with this as well, and I think the moral philosophizing is a safe, abstract way to approach the idea without re-traumatizing yourself - in other words: I feel ya!

As for other people, who knows? I don't think it's possible to make a blanket statement. They may be trying to push morality to its radical limits and feel hurt because they've worked hard to get to their conclusions. Or they're attached to their ideas. Or they are very well victimized individuals. Life is complex, which is why we have philosophy I suppose!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Donation drives

2026 Donation Goal

Goal
$1,800.00
Earned
$910.00
This donation drive ends in
0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds
  50.6%

Trending content

Featured content

Back
Top Bottom