• We are a multilingual website again. Read the notice about this.
  • Understand AI use at MyPTSD: all AI use is explained in our AI help page. AI use is by choice here. It exists if you want it, but does nothing unless you choose to use it.

Loving Someone With Ptsd Is Emotional Abuse

  • Post starter Post starter Akadgafa
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't know why I keep coming back to this thread even though I haven't responded in months. Moth to a flame. It's the generalizations that hurt so bad.

Their sufferers can't manage their lives and so the supporters do everything for them. Take take of them physically, emotionally, financially. Cook, clean, shop, manage the household and take them to all their appointments. All the while being called vile names, being screamed and and being blamed for making them sick
That is some messed up stuff right there. It's called co-dependency. Either the sufferer is taking advantage of their partner, or the partners is acting like an overbearing helicopter parent. Granted, my supporter is getting ready to take me to an appointment, but I do all the rest. In fact, finances stress my supporter out worse than it does myself so I handle all that.

How were they surviving before you got into a relationship with them? If they were doing that bad, they clearly weren't ready for a relationship.
 
I'm not the OP, but I am a supporter whose sufferer lashes out.

It's not so much the amount as much as the duration. Occasional stress reactions while symptomatic are to be expected. Stress reactions all the time, for extended periods of time, with no attempt to treat, manage, or modify behaviors are different. And before I get the comment, yes I know the stress is involuntary, and triggers are different. I'm talking about snarky shitty meanness because of stress. The stress cannot be helped, but can't the reaction over time?

I mean, just because one has PTSD, is there no responsibility for lashing out?

Also, supporters "get it" even if they are angry and hurt by lashing out. Call me a stupid and useless when you're stressed out a few times, meh. Call me stupid and worthless 50 times and it starts to hurt my feelings. That is more than valid. It doesn't matter why.
 
Some of us were with our sufferers before they were injured or traumatized. Some of us began our relationships before the PTSD manifested. Some of us didn't know about the PTSD. Some of us weren't put off by the PTSD at first. There are many reasons why people get into relationships with sufferers.

Also, some of our sufferers, mine included, are 100% disabled. Mine can't leave the house for extended periods of time and is unable to work and function. Some are physically disabled as well, especially the combat vets. There are different severities of PTSD. People need caretakers for legitimate reasons. It's not codependent.

I'm actually one of two caretakers for my sufferer. He has somebody who takes care of him when I'm at work or not around.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: tlc
I'm not the OP, but I am a supporter whose sufferer lashes out.

It's not so much the amount as much as the duration. Oc...
I use to do that, before I knew I was PTSD and before I was medicated.. so, I don't get it.
 
I don't know why I keep coming back to this thread even though I haven't responded in months. Moth to a flame. It's the...

Yeah, I agree with you. This is not PTSD.. this is CODA. ( wrong department ) I guess a supporter and a supportee could get codependent. I was always too independent and didn't want anyone to know me. Long story short, I was PTSD back in my early childhood and was never diagnosed. I've been on my own for a long time. Nobody pays my bills and I'm very able bodied/smart. That was the biggest part of my problem, I couldn't close to anyone... and I didn't know what was wrong.. Okay-- fast forward ( I did get close to one person, in the past) Fast forward 35 years and I just got diagnosed. Thanks to a good friend that had the same thing.. I thought he was crazy but I knew I was a lot like him, except for his thinking. I'm more open minded and curious and he is very gifted, talented, educated... blah,blah- although I can see the patterns that he follows in his thinking. People are use to only what they can understand with repetitive thinking.. It's fun to see it but it's so boring. Anyway, the therapist told me in my last session that I was severe PTSD.. I've been in business for over 25 years and mostly on my own. I was burn out frm major corporations.. so. I haven't read the whole thread but I will.

Original quote from Ukejah-- "Their sufferers can't manage their lives and so the supporters do everything for them. Take take of them physically, emotionally, financially. Cook, clean, shop, manage the household and take them to all their appointments. All the while being called vile names, being screamed and and being blamed for making them sick
 
Just because you are capable of working and supporting yourself doesn't mean all sufferers are.

Also, the quote you are referring to is about "some supporters". Not all supporters have to caretake.
 
I should have quoted the full post. (In my original post I wrote part of it because I couldn't figure out in the old forum how to quote anyone. This forum is different.)


It's not so easy to "walk away". There are plenty of reasons why people stay in abusive relationships. Conditioning, fear, manipulation, financial need, what have you. Love is a factor in some. Same things apply with these relationships.

You know what also keeps some supporters in these abusive relationships?

Guilt.

They're in caretaker roles. Their sufferers can't manage their lives and so the supporters do everything for them. Take take of them physically, emotionally, financially. Cook, clean, shop, manage the household and take them to all their appointments. All the while being called vile names, being screamed and and being blamed for making them sick. There are stories here about people getting lashed out at for sighing or knocking on a door. Try that shit on daily for years. But imagine the person doing that has to have a caretaker, and they're fresh out of spare ones.

Then there is the PTSD guilt. They lash out because they're symptomatic. Or the lovely party line we've been getting in this thread. We've never been shot, or beaten with electric cords, or whatever, so we need to STFU and deal with it. We're the lucky ones. You need to feel sorry for me while I'm calling you names and screaming at you with my finger in your face. Every day. For years.

Original quote from Ukejah-- "Their sufferers can't manage their lives and so the supporters do everything for them. Take take of them physically, emotionally, financially. Cook, clean, shop, manage the household and take them to all their appointments. All the while being called vile names, being screamed and and being blamed for making them sick
[/QUOTE]

Also, the quote you are referring to is about "some supporters". Not all supporters have to caretake
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You know what also keeps some supporters in these abusive relationships?

Guilt.

They're in caretaker roles. Their sufferers can't manage their lives and so the supporters do everything for them.

It was specified.
 
Just because you are capable of working and supporting yourself doesn't mean all sufferers are.

Also, the quote you are...


Just because I work doesn't mean every PTSD person does and some supporters caretake and others don't.. so I simply don't get why this has to be rehashed. Is this filler for a thread? It's half of one and sixteen of another but all comes down to 50/50.

Some PTSD people work some PTSD people don't work
Some PTSD people have caretakers other PTSD people have no caretaker.
Some PTSD people want caretakers and other PTSD people don't want caretakers.
Some PTSD people don't want the caretakers they have and some PTSD people are satisfied with the care takers they have.
Some caretakers work and some caretakers don't work.

Some caretakers have PTSD peoples [1] and some caretakers don't have PTSD peoples [1] as of late [2]
Some caretakers want PTSD peoples and some caretakers don"t want PTSD peoples [2]
Some caretakers don't want the PTSD people they have [3] and some caretakers are satisfied with the PTSD people [1] they have.

[1] wives, husbands, children, bosses, animals, dad, mother, friend, boyfriend, girlfriend, partner, etc
[2] late, later or latter, past tense, present tense, simple past, simple present, future perfect tense
[3] have had, has had, has

This PTSD person is going to work-out.

Some PTSD people find working-out is an exercise in focus, other PTSD people don't see working out as an exercise in focus.
Some caretakers see working-out is a stress reliever and other caretakers don't see working-out as stress reliever.
Some caretakers do see working out as an exercise in focus and some caretakers don;t see working out as a stress reliver.
Some PTSD people find working out as a stress reliever and other PTSD people don't see
 
^ Last sentence
Some PTSD people find working out as a stress reliever and other PTSD people don't see working out as a stress reliever.
 
Let's look at this another way, with a hypothetical scenario.

If John Doe refuses to seek help because of misplaced guilt, but instead chooses to remain ill. Abusing substances, self harming, risking his life unnecessarily. Feeling that he not deserve anything better.

If he were to ask. "Why, isn't my life improving?"
It would be fair to respond. "Because you're not doing anything to improve it". Would it not?
If he were to reply. "But helping myself is unpleasant".
You know what else is fair? Well. Maybe not fair, but accurate? To call this whining.
If you don't like the word whining, you could use whinging or pity mongering. As a couple examples.

As much as what happened to him sucks, that it was unfair and he was undeserving of such a thing. The fact is, life isn't fair.
People and circumstance don't always work for our good. This is just how it is. In fact, life can f*cking suck.
Why should he get a free pass because life is unfair?
He shouldn't.

Now, let's look at Jane Doe. John Doe's supporter.
Let's say for hypothetical purposes, that not only is John Doe a pity monger, he's an abusive one.
So now we have what the OP described. A sufferer who spouts the line "Oh, woe is me, you stupid bitch." In other words, an asshole.

Now, here's the thing that I am having trouble with.
Suppose Jane Doe, should begin doing the same thing as John.
"Oh woe is me. John is so horrid to me, but I won't do anything about it, because I feel guilty. I know what I need to do to help myself, but it's unpleasant."

So, why does Jane Doe get a free pass, when John doesn't deserve one?
She shouldn't.

You know what else?
I was pretty hard on the sufferer, wasn't I? Totally lacking in sympathy, you could say.
Guess what? I am one.

I don't get to bury myself in misery and whine and moan about how unfair life is. I have bills to pay. I have my own supporters whom I care deeply for. They are not my whipping posts. They are my strength. Not objects of my frustration. Nor would they remain in such a role, were I to turn on them as such. Because they are human beings, deserving of love and compassion. As well as my support, when I can give it.
Am I perfect? Nooope. Far, far from it.
Have I never spoken a harsh word in anger to someone who didn't deserve it? Of course I have. To say otherwise would be the biggest lie I've ever told.
Why was it ok for me to have done this kind of abuse, when I condemn others like me? It wasn't ok. This is why I had to take personal responsibility for my behaviour. Because sorry doesn't cut it.
Learning to behave like a civilised person doesn't change what I've done or said. Nor does it erase the hurt and shame.
But I can live with it, because I proved to myself and the people around me that I am not the monster I was turning into. Not will I fall back on excuses and bullshit to whitewash my bad behaviour. And yes, it was very unpleasant. But it had to be done.

If I can honestly hold someone who suffers from a debilitating mental illness to conduct themselves to such rigorous standards. Why is it wrong to expect the same from someone who's faculties are apparently in better working order? Especially when it comes to helping themselves?
If I don't get to use my guilt as an excuse to whine about being in an unbearable situation as a sufferer. Why is then ok for a supporter to do the same?

There was one other thing mentioned in this thread I want to touch upon.

It was mentioned that the OP was "venting". That one of the functions of the anonymous supporters section, is to accommodate this in a safe way. Fair enough, I even agree with that.

However. This is strictly my opinion, as it is not my place to dictate forum policy.
I feel there is a difference between venting and preaching.

To me, venting looks like:
My sufferer is being abusive. He is treating me like a punching bag. I feel no sympathy for him because he is being an asshole. I feel trapped in this relationship. People who have dissenting opinions, please remain silent for I am just expressing myself.
Great, all the power to you.

Preaching, on the other hand:
All us supporters are being abused. We are being treated as punching bags. We should have no sympathy for them because they are being assholes. We are trapped in these relationships. People with dissenting opinions please remain silent, because you are wrong.
Umm. What?

See what I mean?
One is letting out pent up stress over a personal matter, by social means to garner support or sympathy.

The other is using a personal matter to sway others opinions to a common and unfortunately for this thread, a seemingly negative end.

I apologise for the long winded tirade.

P.S.
The OP said this, I sure hope I don't do this (to others). :(
It hurt to read this. Doubly so that no one responded.

As long as you pay attention to how the things you do and say affect others, plus ask yourself what you would feel were you in their shoes interacting with you.
If you can feel good in it for yourself, your probably doing just fine by others.
Plus it's never a bad idea to ask. If you are open to criticism, you will get it.

I hope that helps.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Donation drives

2026 Donation Goal

Goal
$1,800.00
Earned
$910.00
This donation drive ends in
0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds
  50.6%

Trending content

Featured content

Back
Top Bottom