but it is so much better than what I experienced so not so sure. It is not abusive.
I think that's totally legitimate. But, maybe keep in mind that you're not sure. (yet) I'm not fond of labels. I think things can be "unacceptable" even if they aren't "abusive". I was married for 12 years. My ex wasn't what I'd call "abusive". But, I set the bar kind of low. He never hit me. LOL There's room for debate whether or not he was abusive, I guess. In the end, it just wasn't a relationship that was working and he wasn't willing to change anything. And, when I thought about it, "Why should he?" Because things were totally the way he wanted them. Of course he was satisfied. The thing is, if he'd actually loved ME, not what I could do, or what i represented, or what ever, then he'd have been willing to change. In fact, the marriage really WAS all about him. So, whether he was technically abusive or not, it wasn't a situation, when it came right down to it, that I wanted to live with for the rest of my life. (Unless I'd been sure and ok with the the idea that 'the rest of my life' was going to be pretty short.)
There's no way for any of us to judge your situation real accurately from this far away. We all tend to see things through the lens of our own experiences too. But, personally, I've found that there are a lot of areas where the way I tend to see things, especially the way I tend to value myself (or not, to be more accurate) are kind of skewed and it really helps to have an objective person to run stuff by.
BTW, when I started discussing the fact that I was considering divorce with friends? Even those who liked my ex? They were all more sure I should leave than I was. And none of them seemed to think I was "the bad guy". (And I couple said, "I could have told you that before you married him, if you'd asked.")