- Post starter
- #13
Epigenetics are a really amazing field and something that partly explains accumulation of e.g. depression or anxiety disorders in families. We just get pre-methylized genes from our parents and therefore are prone to getting illnesses that are in no way a 'classically' genetical thing.
So far so good, but IMHO this is only one part of it. The other is that from the beginning of our life we watch our parents (and maybe other close family members) dealing with problems of all kinds. We hear them talking about things, good ones, bad ones, catastrophes, lost family members and so on. And we adopt their ways of thinking and feeling.
Apart from the real classic genetic things, which one has the greater impact on how our minds work? I don't know but think both of them are very important from my personal experience.
The text as such is interesting, but to this sentences I can't agree. Some studies on that subject would be very interesting- what happens to children who don't grow up in their families from the beginning of their lives, especially twins that grow up in different families and so on.
Without testing this one IMHO can't say if there is a pure-genetically component and if there is one, how important it is.
I really don't think this is because of "subconcious genetics" but because of the fact that a e.g. traumatized parent is more likely to traumatize his or her children than a non-traumatized one or that a child growing up in a family of 6 generations of lawyers just is educated towards becoming one, too. Not just in school and so on but from the whole personal and social values one takes over from the parents and family in the childhood. From the hobbies and interests that are supported by the family, that are given very positive values and other interests that are disdained, maybe the interest of repairing cars in a family of doctors.
Often the easiest explanation is the right (surely not everytime).
Well, nevertheless this may explain some psychological parts of familiar illnesses, in particular psychological ones including stress-induced secondary organic illnesses.
But what if no one in your family has any of the organic illnesses you have? That's a matter of fact with me. We truly share our tendency towards depression and a light general "non-happiness" but all the other things that my body 'has'... No.
So far so good, but IMHO this is only one part of it. The other is that from the beginning of our life we watch our parents (and maybe other close family members) dealing with problems of all kinds. We hear them talking about things, good ones, bad ones, catastrophes, lost family members and so on. And we adopt their ways of thinking and feeling.
Apart from the real classic genetic things, which one has the greater impact on how our minds work? I don't know but think both of them are very important from my personal experience.
Beside individual and collective subconscious, in subconscious part of us there exist one more "sector" in which are placed files that possess something that is called familiar subconscious. This is something that we inherit from our ancestors through our genetics.
The text as such is interesting, but to this sentences I can't agree. Some studies on that subject would be very interesting- what happens to children who don't grow up in their families from the beginning of their lives, especially twins that grow up in different families and so on.
Without testing this one IMHO can't say if there is a pure-genetically component and if there is one, how important it is.
"That is why we often notice within family, for example, five generations of lawyers or seven generations of doctors or four generations of alcoholics, suicides, schizophrenics, divorces, etc."
I really don't think this is because of "subconcious genetics" but because of the fact that a e.g. traumatized parent is more likely to traumatize his or her children than a non-traumatized one or that a child growing up in a family of 6 generations of lawyers just is educated towards becoming one, too. Not just in school and so on but from the whole personal and social values one takes over from the parents and family in the childhood. From the hobbies and interests that are supported by the family, that are given very positive values and other interests that are disdained, maybe the interest of repairing cars in a family of doctors.
Often the easiest explanation is the right (surely not everytime).
Well, nevertheless this may explain some psychological parts of familiar illnesses, in particular psychological ones including stress-induced secondary organic illnesses.
But what if no one in your family has any of the organic illnesses you have? That's a matter of fact with me. We truly share our tendency towards depression and a light general "non-happiness" but all the other things that my body 'has'... No.