I guess this is such a tricky thing because "god talk" can be so triggering.
I would guess that for a lot of people it is triggering because they have been abused by people who wrap themselves in some kind of "religious" justification - and who use "religion" to demean and control others. There is a lot of this in the world.:( In all religions, more's the pity.
Happily, having solid ethical and moral beliefs and commitments appears to be independent from having any particular metaphysical or spiritual beliefs. A person can be virtuous and have no religion. A person can be virtuous and be very religious. A person can be vicious and have no religion. A person can be vicious and be totally wrapped up in their religion. If the "good guys and bad guys" in the world DID have some clearly distinguishing marks/affiliation (black and white hats, fat or thin, skin color, how far apart their eyes are set, ANYTHING) it would make life simpler. But alas, you can't tell about someone until you actually learn about them in particular.
Slightly Silly part:
I used to canvass (door to door fundraise) for an environmental organization when I was in college. It was hard to do. I didn't particularly like knocking on the doors of total strangers and asking them for money:(but it was a job, and I believed the organization was doing really really good work for everyone. Most everyone was very nice to me, and on several occasions in bad winter weather I sat out my shift in some friendly person's kitchen eating cookies and drinking tea.:) I was pretty good at it. This gives me a slightly different perspective on the "knocking on doors" thing.
I definitely fell into the category of "naive" then. I think most folks who do this are, and a lot of people (especially if they've come from a "narrow" background) tend to go into "condescending" when challenged. That is, after all, what others have most likely done to them, so it is what they know. Personally, I find them rather charming. (I am impervious to condescension from strangers.:geek:) Honestly, how many people in the world have the chutzpa to impose on complete strangers to save them from a harm they might not even believe in? I usually invite them in for tea and then try to teach them about Immanuel Kant's arguments from his book "Religion within the limits of Reason Alone". (18th century German philosophical theology! Woo hoo!:cool:) It is kind of the opposite of what they are usually about, and he gives much better arguments than theirs, so I think it might help loosen up any "hardening of the categories" they have. Curiously, or not, they also NEVER come back or send anyone else.:(