Prime-No eludes to an observation I have made about the so-called "mental health" community as well. Speaking in what I acknowledge are generalisations, it seems that most people fit into one of two camps - those who carefully and deliberately choose to conceal or withhold details of their illness from all but a select few (if any) outsiders, and those who seem to have swung to the other extreme and tend to announce the details to the world at large, almost as though they have come to internalise their illness as the singular "thing" that defines them and as the core component of their identity. It's almost as though we as humans grapple with the struggle between being ashamed of what has happened to us/what we are experiencing, and being proud of, or defined, by it.
Sadly, I fear that either extreme is a struggle, both for the sufferer and for those in their vicinity. Secrecy and denial only serve to perpetuate the stigma and isolation that we all know so well, as well as alienate and misinform the community and reinforce the view that it is indeed something shameful to be hidden and denied wherever possible. Yet those who are so very open about it seem to have adopted an almost sense of entitlement, as though their illness is a badge of honour and achievement for their past and those without such illness have obviously not struggled and suffered as they have... which sadly also breeds resentment, misunderstanding and avoidance on the part of those who may feel overwhelmed and bombarded by the sufferer's intensity.
I guess I say all that to say that striking the balance for each individual seems to be the ultimate challenge - one I certainly struggle with. I do see a consistent theme coming through in many of your responses which I do believe is true, that being that in order to dispel the stigmas and increase the flow of accurate information, the emphasis in disclosing/sharing should be on "what happened to you" as opposed to "what is wrong with you". This is a subtle, yet very critical, shift in focus, and one which I think can go a long way towards diminishing some of the stigma that is held both by sufferers and the general community about mental illness.
Maddog
Sadly, I fear that either extreme is a struggle, both for the sufferer and for those in their vicinity. Secrecy and denial only serve to perpetuate the stigma and isolation that we all know so well, as well as alienate and misinform the community and reinforce the view that it is indeed something shameful to be hidden and denied wherever possible. Yet those who are so very open about it seem to have adopted an almost sense of entitlement, as though their illness is a badge of honour and achievement for their past and those without such illness have obviously not struggled and suffered as they have... which sadly also breeds resentment, misunderstanding and avoidance on the part of those who may feel overwhelmed and bombarded by the sufferer's intensity.
I guess I say all that to say that striking the balance for each individual seems to be the ultimate challenge - one I certainly struggle with. I do see a consistent theme coming through in many of your responses which I do believe is true, that being that in order to dispel the stigmas and increase the flow of accurate information, the emphasis in disclosing/sharing should be on "what happened to you" as opposed to "what is wrong with you". This is a subtle, yet very critical, shift in focus, and one which I think can go a long way towards diminishing some of the stigma that is held both by sufferers and the general community about mental illness.
Maddog