• We are a multilingual website again. Read the notice about this.
  • Understand AI use at MyPTSD: all AI use is explained in our AI help page. AI use is by choice here. It exists if you want it, but does nothing unless you choose to use it.

News The God Debate

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh....I also meant to say.... I love John Lennon's song, "Imagine," which @Barberian posted a link to!! And yes, I do think the world would be a much happier, more peaceful place if it were to be that way.
Me too! And thank you very much for validating my belief that I am hosting a civil discussion without agenda to force my beliefs on unwilling participants. I do want to further my beliefs though, to be sure... because I also believe that John Lennon had a good idea set to music. I think it could be expounded on, since lyrics only hint at an idea. But, yes, it will take a larger number of people to admit that they don't really believe in the religion they've been taught... and that they doubt there is a god (at least in the form we've been imagining), in order for a world where fairness, equality, respect for others, etc... would be possible.

Where might I debate this issue? In the Unitarian Church? Perhaps. But, why would my world view be unwelcome here when there is a Christian thread calling for religious support somewhere in the archives? I do believe that the world would be a better place if we embraced those parts of our world religions which address social civility, and if we expunged the parts of our world religions of all supernatural references and the inherent sacrilege of doubting those references.[DOUBLEPOST=1400427937][/DOUBLEPOST]
You just described heaven.
How do you know?
 
I want believers to understand that their belief is harmful to others,
'Can be' rather than 'is' I think? Most of the people I know on a personal level who have different beliefs to me don't use it to harm me or others. It is quite a narrow view to present it as absolute as that I think.
Did I create a thread called "The God Debate" because I wasn't sure which side of the argument I would be on? No. Who would do that?
Someone who wasnt sure where they stood on the issue maybe? Someone who has been brought up with religion and is starting to question it? Someone who has been brought up without religion and is now questioning that? Someone who is searching for meaning in their life?...
 
Did I create a thread called "The God Debate" because I wasn't sure which side of the argument I would be on? No. Who would do that?

As I said earlier, I was brought up Christian. It was something that was completely interwoven into my life from birth, so there was a time between being brought up with that, and finding my own way that I might have started a debate without knowing which side I was on, to get a better understanding of both sides before forming my own conclusions.
 
Thank you!
You're welcome!



I respect your decision. What did God tell you?

.

Thank you! He didn't tell me anything. He gave me life. He gave me free will. Free to choose between good and evil. He provides a beautiful planet full of life to experience love happiness and joy. It is the true human experience. I will give back in love happiness and joy. That is my choice
 
I have not censored others, though I was quite tempted to chastise the shameless plug for Jehovah's Witness.

Was it a plug or just someone stating what they believed and the impact that it had on them? Is it any more a plug to state

I want believers to understand that their belief is harmful to others, particularly those of us who would sacrifice our lives for our beliefs.

or just a statement of your opinion?

Is belief harmful in and of itself? If I believe that child abuse is wrong and I think that the majority of people here would agree with me, the "why" of that belief may be different. I believe it is wrong because I see all children as a precious gift of life, that is to be nurtured and cherished as God intended. Someone else may believe that to have a healthy society we need to raise healthy children, and not have the base of that belief rooted in any religion.

Who is to say who is wrong, and to try to censor open and healthy conversation is to impede upon freedom. Does not each person value freedom at its core? Especially the freedom of speech? Is it not more of "how" we communicate rather than the communication itself?

To force any religion, viewpoint, ideology on anther person is unacceptable. However to state your own beliefs and have honest and open discussion is not something I will give up. Freedom of religion does not equate into freedom from religion, and no more than any one religion has the right to force its belief on others, no other entity has the right to eliminate the right to choose to practice a particular
religion.

All of us have suffered trauma and many by a person using force to push their own wishes upon us, against our will. I have experienced not having freedom and especially not having a voice, and to promote that type of society will leave all of us open for abuse, especially the abuse of power.

Why do I believe in God, because he gave us the freedom to choose. He doesn't force himself upon us, and it is only humans that think they are serving God by using force that have it all screwed up.
 
What if half the people on earth were more curious about what is real than willing to please a god they believe will reward them after they die?

Only half the people on earth even follow the Abrahamic religions (Islam, Christianity and Judaism).

@Muzikluvr, I really have to repeat that I think you're over-generalising your local, fundamentalist Christian environment. The USA is not the world. Religion where you are - even Christianity where you are - is not the same in every other place.

"What is real" depends on what is real to each individual. There is no "reality" that applies to everyone on earth. Science isn't reality, it's the use of ever-changing models that are our current best fit for how things happen and how to make them work. There isn't even a single model for all aspects. If you want a road bridge, you need Newtonian physics. If you want a spacecraft you need Quantum physics. We have road bridges and spacecraft, despite the fact that the Newtonian model and the Quantum model say different things. So which is real? Neither is identified as real, they're both just identified as models that work in some situations and not in others.

But really, my point is that I still think you need to define your scope when you're discussing this. I don't see how you can use the word "religion" if you mean Christian fundamentalism, or "God" if you mean a Christian fundamentalist God, or "reality" when there is no agreement on what this is and science doesn't even use "what is real" as a basis for how it works.
 
Last edited:
But, those who would rape and murder, they already decided that they don't believe in heaven or hell. They can control everyone around them by understanding our shared beliefs. If we are mostly Christian, then they use our desire to please Christ by asking ourselves "What would Jesus do?". They make suggestions about our religion to get us thinking about it, while they torment and torture us.

Can you see how you're taking your individual experience and applying it to everyone?

My rapists and would-be murderers did not control me by understanding my beliefs. I'm sure they never made any decision about heaven or hell, because their upringing probably didn't even bother to mention the concepts. I'm sure they couldn't have cared less about Christianity either way, because I don't live in a fundamentalist Christian area and my abusers didn't use religion against me.

My rapes and would-be murder had ZERO connection to religion. I'm finding it incredibly frustrating that you don't seem to be able to see that your experience was your experience. Instead, you're generalising it to the whole world, including the non-Christian-fundamentalist majority.
 
Last edited:
By dissolve, I mean go into the history books along with Zeus and the others that we no longer believe in.
You should really research world religions before making statements about what people believe in. There are many thousands of Hellenic Polytheists around the world who still worship the Greek gods. There are ceremonies in Greece attended by thousands and smaller Hellenic festivals in the United States every year. Hellenism is becoming popular enough that there were three of us in one of my writing groups out of only about 20 people.

I'm not aware of any religion which is completely dead except for those belief systems which were annihilated and lost to history due to the cruel actions of Christianity and Islam.
 
Muzikluvr said:

What if there is actually an explanation for many coincidences, and for the spirituality we all feel... an explanation that doesn't include one God, but instead involves an interdependence that we all feel not only emotionally, but also physically. The elements of our bodies naturally combine with each other. When those bonds are broken, the elements don't disappear, but seek new bonds.
What if our society believed in a collective consciousness without borders, without prejudices, without biases? What if we supported and cared for one another, the creatures on the earth, the earth and our universe in a spirit of interrelated, interdependence?

How do you know?

How do you? How does anyone? None of us are certain. Each of us go on faith. :)

I find it ironic everyone basically believes in the same thing. Peace and good will.
 
Can you see how you're taking your individual experience and applying it to everyone?
Yes, I can see that. Thank you. I do not believe it is a logical way of viewing the world. I am rereading what I've written and gaining insight into the assumptions that often blind my reasoning.

I will continue to say things I regret, to reveal my biases unchecked, not because I want to, no. I do not want to sound foolish. Had I tried to have this discussion before I'd come so far into atheism, we would not have made it this far without devolving into hysterics... I would not be alone in that, and the evidence outside of my own belief, is witnessed in a few posts back by another who abstained from the discussion long enough to see how it goes. I think it takes some measure of security in one's belief in order to be open to hearing other people's beliefs, and to hear criticism of one's path toward logic... out of ritual, mysticism, and the supernatural.

If I waited until I could perfectly explain my argument without divulging my biases and shortcomings, I might wonder why I would even attempt the conversation at all. I believe there are many atheists who feel this way. What's the point? People will choose to believe what they want to believe. The point is that, even at my most faithful, I heard the skeptics and their logic registered. I knew I was choosing to have faith and I nobly believed that I was courageously making that choice and that having doubts only made my choice that much more worthy, special, in God's eyes. When I faced that life changing event that caused me to question the merits of blind faith and the motivation others may have to encourage it, I quickly knew quite a good many reasons to refute the fear mongering prophecies of my demise for rejecting god. I needed that support of the testimony of others who have rejected a personal god. Much like one is taken into a religion with testament and encouragement by others, it takes that to intervene in one's delusion and break the spell.

And, the point is that many people think that Atheists are few and far between, but I believe we are many... we just don't attend church together. We don't commune together. We have little in common but the negative belief in someone else's belief... why would we spend much time talking about that? Except, when we're beginning to see that the wool has been pulled over our eyes since childhood... or when we recognize that believing in something because everyone else does is actually harmful to others.

I am not an authority on Atheism. I was recently asked on Twitter, "Are you sure you're an atheist?" I would never claim to represent all atheists... but then again, all we have in common is our non-belief in any god. And, how does a non-belief band people together? I mean, other than having a common disagreement with the believers around us, we are not necessarily alike. I have been atheist in regard to all gods but one, my whole life. I have just recently decided that that one doesn't likely exist either. I wonder if there is a god, at all, I cannot completely rule it out, though I believe it is not likely.

I believe that we need to speak out publicly against the mistaken belief that because many people believe something is true, that it is true. Perception is easily manipulated. Some people add to the numbers of those who believe, but they don't actually believe it. A group of people can believe they've seen something that didn't happen, because of "group thinking" where those who didn't see it don't speak up... they wait to see what others say... and then, others describe bits of what they saw, and then everyone begins to remember that they saw it too.

Do the masses need a God in order to change their behavior? Do most people want to follow like sheep? Are most people disinterested in how we got here and if we're meant to achieve something while we're alive? Are most people too overwhelmed with the business of life to question religion? Do most people just get in a routine and leave the decisions about religion to others? I suppose the same could be asked of politics. What would make people stop going along to get along and start thinking about what is underlying the Sunday School lesson?

Should our government support religion in order to control those less fortunate about us? To give them reason to be grateful? To give them reason to rejoice? To appease their sense of fairness, with the promise of going to heaven and their persecutors and greedy bosses going to hell?

I knew I should have mentioned the Jehovah's Witness. I'm sorry it offended you @intothelight . I too have been visited by them at an inopportune time, when I was in the midst of an upsetting flashback. Here was one exploiting my thread as if it were an opportunity from god. Perhaps god gave me the power to create this discussion. And, here we are, back to wondering why I would even start it to begin with when people who want to believe in god will believe it despite my assertion that my mind is my own.

Incidentally, I will ask again. Why is it comforting to you to believe that god has manipulated me to create this discussion? Why would you prefer to think that the world is so ordered and under the control of some supernatural being? Why do you cling to that idea?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Donation drives

2026 Donation Goal

Goal
$1,800.00
Earned
$910.00
This donation drive ends in
0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds
  50.6%

Trending content

Featured content

Back
Top Bottom