- Admin
- #1
anthony
Founder
I often see people confused with their therapist, especially when I see the same things posted over and over, ie. I tell them a problem and all they do is respond with, "how does that make you feel" or such statements, without actually providing any substance or input.
Ok, here is the difference. The above example will still get used in trauma therapy at times, as the client should always be given the opportunity to see if they can solve their own problem, and often do. Saying that, if that is the extent of your therapy, that is not trauma therapy. That type of therapy is the primary type, being person centered therapy. It is extremely effective for nearly every other type of therapy (relationships, teen, substance abuse, general problems and concerns, etc).
Trauma Therapy - This requires the therapist to actually have an extensive knowledge of trauma. For example, when I say I have studied PTSD for six years, that means six years of studying traumatology, which I apply only upon PTSD. The diagnosis is irrelevant for the most part, it is the underlying cause, being trauma. So a trauma therapist should have an extensive and primary focus on trauma. Why?
The answer is simple. PTSD is a complicated diagnosis, it has complicated symptoms, and gets only more complicated with complex and military based trauma. You will not be able to solve your own problem at most areas due to trauma, hence the impact of trauma. A trauma therapist will instead become more like an educator of knowledge, they will guide you and push you in the right direction, and feed you knowledge about WHY specific occur for you to then use that knowledge to find your own solution. They still should not be giving you the solution, because that would be implanting, which is a big no-no... but they should be giving you the underlying knowledge specific to your circumstance / trauma at each given point within a discussion, so using your situation + their knowledge of the underlying problem, you piece them together uniquely and apply to your situation, logic and understanding.
This way, you still solved your own issue, but you did it with a combination of your knowledge + their knowledge of traumatology = you create your own unique outcome.
If you don't have that education being implemented specifically to your situation in trauma therapy, then you are only getting "therapy", which is useless, compared to "trauma therapy", which combines traumatology education specific only to your situation.
Who is a trauma therapist?
They can be from vast educational backgrounds, PhD is incorrect if that is what you think. Nurses, social workers, psychologists, psychiatrists on rare occasions, counsellors, even doctors (MD's) become therapists... there are a vast range of tertiary qualifications that qualify as a counsellor. Talking with your friend is counselling... in its simplest form.
It has nothing to do with the qualification, it has to do with their specific field of expertise. A qualification does not make a good relationship counsellor. A specific type of person combined with a qualification makes a good relationship counsellor. Such a person often won't be as effective as another person who will be good at trauma counselling, where subject knowledge is vaster as well as personality type is required to be a little more demanding and assertive at times due to factors associated with trauma (uniquely per client basis).
What you want to find is someone who fits that field... someone who you could question with traumatology questions and they have the answers. That is a good sign they are current and know what their doing with helping you with your trauma.
It is as important that you interview your therapist as they interview you for suitability. Someone who lets you get away with things, who is warm and comfortable, is not the right person to help you if you ask them about trauma subjects applicable to your situation and they don't have the information. That information is the substance of being able to give to you in sessions, or even after sessions upon greater thought or follow-up.
That is who you're looking for, not whether they have a PhD or such title.
Ok, here is the difference. The above example will still get used in trauma therapy at times, as the client should always be given the opportunity to see if they can solve their own problem, and often do. Saying that, if that is the extent of your therapy, that is not trauma therapy. That type of therapy is the primary type, being person centered therapy. It is extremely effective for nearly every other type of therapy (relationships, teen, substance abuse, general problems and concerns, etc).
Trauma Therapy - This requires the therapist to actually have an extensive knowledge of trauma. For example, when I say I have studied PTSD for six years, that means six years of studying traumatology, which I apply only upon PTSD. The diagnosis is irrelevant for the most part, it is the underlying cause, being trauma. So a trauma therapist should have an extensive and primary focus on trauma. Why?
The answer is simple. PTSD is a complicated diagnosis, it has complicated symptoms, and gets only more complicated with complex and military based trauma. You will not be able to solve your own problem at most areas due to trauma, hence the impact of trauma. A trauma therapist will instead become more like an educator of knowledge, they will guide you and push you in the right direction, and feed you knowledge about WHY specific occur for you to then use that knowledge to find your own solution. They still should not be giving you the solution, because that would be implanting, which is a big no-no... but they should be giving you the underlying knowledge specific to your circumstance / trauma at each given point within a discussion, so using your situation + their knowledge of the underlying problem, you piece them together uniquely and apply to your situation, logic and understanding.
This way, you still solved your own issue, but you did it with a combination of your knowledge + their knowledge of traumatology = you create your own unique outcome.
If you don't have that education being implemented specifically to your situation in trauma therapy, then you are only getting "therapy", which is useless, compared to "trauma therapy", which combines traumatology education specific only to your situation.
Who is a trauma therapist?
They can be from vast educational backgrounds, PhD is incorrect if that is what you think. Nurses, social workers, psychologists, psychiatrists on rare occasions, counsellors, even doctors (MD's) become therapists... there are a vast range of tertiary qualifications that qualify as a counsellor. Talking with your friend is counselling... in its simplest form.
It has nothing to do with the qualification, it has to do with their specific field of expertise. A qualification does not make a good relationship counsellor. A specific type of person combined with a qualification makes a good relationship counsellor. Such a person often won't be as effective as another person who will be good at trauma counselling, where subject knowledge is vaster as well as personality type is required to be a little more demanding and assertive at times due to factors associated with trauma (uniquely per client basis).
What you want to find is someone who fits that field... someone who you could question with traumatology questions and they have the answers. That is a good sign they are current and know what their doing with helping you with your trauma.
It is as important that you interview your therapist as they interview you for suitability. Someone who lets you get away with things, who is warm and comfortable, is not the right person to help you if you ask them about trauma subjects applicable to your situation and they don't have the information. That information is the substance of being able to give to you in sessions, or even after sessions upon greater thought or follow-up.
That is who you're looking for, not whether they have a PhD or such title.