Greetings,
I'm reactive in relation to verbal arguments, personal attacks, road rage incidents, etc. For myself I hold on the best I can in relation to conflicts observed between my siblings and their respective spouses. I do not take sides, and will not expand upon a relation if the currency to budget such expansion is denominated in terms of confidence broken, dirt shared, and free-form character assassination authorized and encouraged by this party or that. It is a source of great regret that the dysfunctional template of our parent's relationship (such as it was) did not stir within my sisters like-curiosity to the extent of heading off what could easily be a generational pattern, hence I try (even at the cost of seeing them hardly at all) to use their example as a cautionary indicator of what I must take so seriously by contrast.
In public spaces - I leave the premises if I can at all manage. No sides are taken - sorry - gotta go! Violent films or disturbing content? Eyes shut, ears plugged; i.e. I'm not being entertained - thank you very much! I tried to watch the Denzel Washington vehicle Flight, but had to leave the theater. I returned hoping for some degree of narrative closure, but remain dubious as to the worth of my effort.
Driving fast? Gee - not quite for me for such was a release of sorts in my youth and not a very healthy or civic-minded one at that. I suppose I'm the slowest thing on the road now, for nothing matters so much that I'd risk my life or the life of another for passing in a dicey situation. What makes such dicey? - a succession of decisions that equate the dangerous to normative range behavior. The establishment of horrible governments is premised upon such.
Even within an atmosphere of conflict and awareness of the emergence of irreconcilable difference, civility must always be maintained - especially if no other aspect of the environment will support it. If the atmosphere is wholly suffused with standard-setting incivility - escape that environment if such is possible. Long-term exposure to many an unpleasant environment forces one to assertively see to environmental quality control establishment and the maintenance of such. For myself, I believe that for whatever social circumstance I invest in from here on out, that such cannot help but be qualitatively different - or so I unsteadily state! I know I harbored no desire to passively accept matters as were, hence might I do better?
It's strange for while I hate violence and in some sense I identify as a philosophical pacifist, I cannot recommend to any that simply absorbing punishment without a proportional response is a sustainable life orientation. Much of my PTSD identity is rooted in my failure to defend myself across circumstance from socio-emotional violence I could not effectively counteract. Hypervigilence here mixed with an acute awareness of historical power imbalances and the cost of the same. In short - usually I flee!
M.