scout86
VIP Member
I'm not sure this is the right place to put this. (Mods, I trust your judgement on that!) I'm hoping to get feedback from people with really diverse thoughts on the subject.
Awhile back, my T suggested I watch the movie "Inside Out'. He said, a long time ago, that he thinks I'm not very connected with my feelings. (I have "feelings"? :wideeyed:)
So, I watched the movie & we talked about it a little, He said to watch it again and take notes. :rolleyes: The NEXT time we talked about it, 2 weeks ago, he got off on "things he thought had been left out and how could they be included". I asked what he meant, he said, "Well, for example, I think they should have included "being vulnerable" as a thing you can feel." (I'm now measuring the distance to the door in my head and wondering if I can beat him there.) But, I decided to stay with the conversation, so I asked him to elaborate. (Stalling for time and the appearance of a potential escape route!) He said, "Well, you know, like sometimes you trust the wrong person and it turns out badly." (This was NOT where I thought he was going!) That I could deal with. With a certain amount of relish, I said I could easily see how they could have included that. The main character is 11 or so and she runs away from home. Gets on a bus full of strangers to go back to her old town, then decides to go back to her folks instead, and does. I said, "Well, when she got on that bus. THAT could have gone a lot differently. Yep, I can imagine a lot of ways they could have showed "vulnerable", but it would have made it a much different movie and no one would have wanted to watch it."
About then, I noticed he had a rather hard to read expression on his face. Not quite sure why......
Last week, at the beginning of the session, he said, "So, are we going to talk about being vulnerable today?" I asked if we had to, he laughed and said "no", then we talked about it anyway. :banghead: But, it was a nice, safe, easy conversation, that left me totally creeped out. :bag:
We get a lot of questions here from supporters wondering how to get "their sufferer" to talk about their feelings and what's going on in their heads. What is the DEAL with this? I'm serious! I totally don't get it and would really like to understand.
I mean, it's a trick of some kind, right? People might occasionally want to know what I think, but I can't conceive of a reason why they'd want to know how I "feel". Unless they're planning to use it against me somehow. Heck, I don't even want to know how I feel! Like the bad bus ride scenario, these are NOT places people want to go! Do they? They just THINK they do, right?
Had a similar conversation with T about "talking about stuff". He claims it's helpful. I said, "I don't get that. It's not actually going to CHANGE anything." He said that was logical enough, but incorrect, although he could see how it would seem that way if you had very little experience with "talking about stuff" working.
Once again, I totally don't get it. What's the value in rehashing ancient history? (OK, T says there's concrete evidence that shows it can produce changes in the brain that might be good. :rolleyes:)
I have a feeling he's not going to give up on this, what ever it is he's trying to do.:arghh; So, I'd value some input that might help me defend myself. :ninja:
Some of you see this differently than I do, I'm sure. Can you explain the alternative versions of reality? Thanks!
Awhile back, my T suggested I watch the movie "Inside Out'. He said, a long time ago, that he thinks I'm not very connected with my feelings. (I have "feelings"? :wideeyed:)
So, I watched the movie & we talked about it a little, He said to watch it again and take notes. :rolleyes: The NEXT time we talked about it, 2 weeks ago, he got off on "things he thought had been left out and how could they be included". I asked what he meant, he said, "Well, for example, I think they should have included "being vulnerable" as a thing you can feel." (I'm now measuring the distance to the door in my head and wondering if I can beat him there.) But, I decided to stay with the conversation, so I asked him to elaborate. (Stalling for time and the appearance of a potential escape route!) He said, "Well, you know, like sometimes you trust the wrong person and it turns out badly." (This was NOT where I thought he was going!) That I could deal with. With a certain amount of relish, I said I could easily see how they could have included that. The main character is 11 or so and she runs away from home. Gets on a bus full of strangers to go back to her old town, then decides to go back to her folks instead, and does. I said, "Well, when she got on that bus. THAT could have gone a lot differently. Yep, I can imagine a lot of ways they could have showed "vulnerable", but it would have made it a much different movie and no one would have wanted to watch it."
About then, I noticed he had a rather hard to read expression on his face. Not quite sure why......
Last week, at the beginning of the session, he said, "So, are we going to talk about being vulnerable today?" I asked if we had to, he laughed and said "no", then we talked about it anyway. :banghead: But, it was a nice, safe, easy conversation, that left me totally creeped out. :bag:
We get a lot of questions here from supporters wondering how to get "their sufferer" to talk about their feelings and what's going on in their heads. What is the DEAL with this? I'm serious! I totally don't get it and would really like to understand.
I mean, it's a trick of some kind, right? People might occasionally want to know what I think, but I can't conceive of a reason why they'd want to know how I "feel". Unless they're planning to use it against me somehow. Heck, I don't even want to know how I feel! Like the bad bus ride scenario, these are NOT places people want to go! Do they? They just THINK they do, right?
Had a similar conversation with T about "talking about stuff". He claims it's helpful. I said, "I don't get that. It's not actually going to CHANGE anything." He said that was logical enough, but incorrect, although he could see how it would seem that way if you had very little experience with "talking about stuff" working.
Once again, I totally don't get it. What's the value in rehashing ancient history? (OK, T says there's concrete evidence that shows it can produce changes in the brain that might be good. :rolleyes:)
I have a feeling he's not going to give up on this, what ever it is he's trying to do.:arghh; So, I'd value some input that might help me defend myself. :ninja:
Some of you see this differently than I do, I'm sure. Can you explain the alternative versions of reality? Thanks!