In other words, the DSM 5 descriptor should be more important then the words we stick in front of PTSD - no?
The descriptions are incredible important. Not enough ‘therapists’ are actually aware of all the important nuances that go along with the condition, and instead rely very heavily on simplified dot point over-views.
I would think the same applies to "fixing" ptsd, that until you understand how the damage was done it's difficult to fix it......
Yes.
An analogy: the radiator hose blows off while you’re driving, and the car overheats. You have to fix it to keep driving.
Understanding this problem in its simplest form, you’ll lift the hood, and reconnect the hose. And very likely, for a few minutes, you’ll get back in the car feeling like a bit of a mechanical whiz.
But, with even a modicum of understanding about how that radiator actually works, and what’s happened to it with the hose blowing off, you’re going to take a slightly different approach. You’ll reconnect the hose, but then you’ll probably do something else - maybe run the engine for a while with the radiator cap off to get the air out of the system before trying to drive off.
It will take a bit longer, but it will be the difference between driving away successfully, and driving away and having the car overheat again 2 minutes down the road.
There’s noteable differences between ptsd and its variants, which are very relevant to likely success of treatment.
Chronic ptsd: simplified, ptsd that doesn’t seem to want to heal in the usual timeframe. Over 10% of the population will get ptsd at some point in the life, but most will recover in months. So, the person with chronic ptsd has something more complicated going on, and is at greater risk of other specific complications - around here, we’ll often see that as more pathological forms of depression and anxiety, but physical health will also likely suffer.
Combat ptsd: treatment specifically targeted at combat veterans with ptsd is more effective, both in terms of recovery times, and overall success. It can be treated with the usual treatment modalities, but the success of that treatment drops away sharply if its not being approached with an understanding of the nuance of how that specific kind of trauma plays out on individuals, and the types of psychosocial issues that are most often going to piggyback on that form of ptsd. It’s even more important in terms of even just getting sufferers through the door - there’s much less chance of a sufferer with combat ptsd seeking out mainstream treatment without any kind nuanced support.
Complex ptsd: we’re still very much in the infancy of understanding this condition. Unlike ptsd, which has a good recover rate in the general population, complex ptsd has a pretty appalling recovery rate. Physiological changes are significant - the incidence of particular kinds of physical illness that accompanies the complex version start rocketing off the charts. Suicide rates are (easily) 4 times higher than that of general population, and safety planning is less effective. There are significant alterations to the concept of self and, particularly if it’s developmental trauma, significant differences in the size and functioning of key areas of the brain. The response to stressful stimulus also becomes more complicated - whereas with straight ptsd, you can almost set you clock by the hyperactive amygdala, complex ptsd will often do the opposite in response to trauma-related stressors, with emotional blunting and dissociation. The things going on for that person both in their brain, and around their body, is
physically different than ptsd. There’s also emerging evidence that the brain of a person with complex ptsd functions differently to the brain of a person with ptsd even when at rest.
We have ‘treatments’ for ptsd which have great results statistically. EMDR and CBT in particular. But the effectiveness of both of these treatments starts to drop away substantially for each of the C variants listed above - combat, chronic and complex. Practitioners with a good understanding of the nuances of those specific variants are going to be better skilled at adapting their therapeutic approach in order to boost the chances of success for their patient.