I'm not sure if others have had the same experience, or sense it, or I am way off base, but I think the differences (or resistance) people may feel in response to BB is ptsd-related, or past trauma or abuse related?
Yes, I find the way she speaks extremely uncomfortable.
I relate the way she speaks directly to the circumstances of the last time I was attacked. So it isn't for me. Something I learned from using her kind of philosophies directly after trauma, is that the person needs to learn how to recognise and take themselves out of the dangerous circumstances first. For me, facing my fear was to go to the website that the man who attacked me was on. When I tried to leave, his friend would tell me that I was running away, that I was letting the fear get to me, that I had to face it. He was a f*cking idiot, and wanted no more than to make it seem like the abuse never happened. One reason I found that acceptable is that I've been brought up to 'face my fears'.
So recovery for me has meant, and means accepting that some situations are dangerous. And to do that means finding the connection to my emotions and fears, and to work on integrating those feelings with trauma. That is a process, and the differentiation between a situation that requires fear to keep you safe, and the imagined fear of the mind has to be made in order to keep an individual safe. If a person hasn't done this work, then advice to let go of fear and do it anyway, is not appropriate for that person.
It takes risk, it takes action, it takes work, it takes commitment, it takes being willing to be uncomfortable. It even takes being willing to trigger, lapse, or cue up a cycle. But I find her ideas very practical and rational.
I don't get all buggered up about writing styles. I get annoyed at about 75% of the "tone" of the books I've read. But I'll tell you what I don't do. I don't let my opinion get in the way of finding a beneficial lesson.
Albatross, it's great that it helped you, I wouldn't take away from that. But in the quote above, it looks to me, like you imagine that people don't like Brown's advice because it's some hard hitting, self-facing truth that they don't like to hear. Or that somehow people not accepting Browns work, is comparative to people not accepting they have a drink problem.
That perhaps has been
your experience, and maybe you did need to face up to a few things, and start trying to face your fears instead of running away from them into alcohol.
At the time that I realised that I needed to stop running and to face my fears, a man tried to kill me. So with
my experience, it is more sensible to look at how my attitude to facing fear puts me in danger.
Can you see how Browns words are completely impractical to me? Perhaps if you had experienced my life, rather than yours, you might have a different view of Brown. My point is, that, if it works for you, great, but the soap box seems inappropriate because recovery needs to recognise the thinking styles and emotional f*cked up-ness that the individual needs to recover from.