You need to know what that exact thought is that causes the response.
'Where do you go when there is no place to go.' Those are the words I used when I called the crisis line a few years back when I was activated and wandering aimlessly in my car one evening. I was hospitalized the following day. I am not certain I would have words for it as it seemed to be an intense flooding, but somehow, that night, the crisis worker (they knew my history by that time), asked me where I was going. The above statement was my answer to her.
You know enough to know that the impulse is to run, hide. Can you put your mind very firmly towards, the next time it happens, just sit down.
I have thought quite a bit about this posting today before I responded, spoke to Sun about her observations and we spoke of some strategies. I understand the idea of breaking the link that you are attempting to get across, JL, and agree with it wholeheartedly. The problem is if I am not moving (if I am to sit) then I drop. And dropping means giving up to it. So I move as much as I can. Until it takes me. The issue is that it is about houses. So in realistic terms, getting into a house would be safest. Given my past (which is too long to consider here), this is not an option - at this point.
what sets off the thought.
Feeling like I need to leave a house. Like I am not welcome. It is consistent. It is not always true, but my interpretation of any type of phrasing that I should go leads to this behaviour....which is, quite frankly, both embarrassing and dangerous.
I believe that you wish to decide and control how you leave this earth, not fall victim to a random event.
This is very close. No, not a death wish. I was too young when it was instilled to understand death imho. However, not falling victim to a random event (without the capacity to think through the consequences) is bang on. Good get.
can a counter-respose be habituated? Specifically - can you activate that state/program on purpose?
This would be dangerous at this point, but I agree with your thoughts on this. I use visualization a ton to break triggers etc. It has been very successful for me. Sun and I spoke about this thought (and all the others in this posting) and based on her observations and my experiences, and an episode that happened yesterday which 5 of us happened to be a part of - Sun and I were successful in being able to 'ease' out of it for the first time EVER! Hurray! So yes, now I see the window. I see that what was said was not necessarily what I heard, and while activated Sun and I worked through what she meant and what I heard. I kept repeating what she meant....so there is a window wired in there now that I haven't had EVER and I will use visualization to re-enforce this whilst not activated. It is the following steps that will be challenging, but one step at a time.
The language you use reminds me of flight but also freeze responses sort of tied together
Yes, this is it, although I would use a Pete Walker term which is Fawn as well. What you describe yourself as feeling is very much as you describe. in my experience, going away was the key to my survival. Long story.
even with compromised reasoning
I think the reasoning in this situation is beyond compromised. It is a complete flooding by a 1 year old. With a teeny tiny bit of accountability (rational thinking) for the one that I will affect if I do run and 'disappear'. It is attempting to open that window just a bit more for my 'adult self' to reason with the 1 year old.
Change the motion before you can address what's behind it / causing the move itself.
So are you speaking as JL is and meaning 'motion' literally?
Also, if you go the other route but one's mind is in a one-track direction, how do you change or affect the mind's direction if you can't 'think' well? (Hope that makes sense.)
Yes, this makes sense to me. I think being mindful of the fact that I am deciding within a 1 year old framework. All I can think of is 'can't go in the house, can't go in the house'. 'Run, run'. Although my body is a 1 year old's as well. She staggers, she trips, she has no idea where she is, she is lost although she is in the backyard and a part of her is wanting to hide and another part of her is attempting to hide somewhere so the person who will ultimately look for her will not worry themselves sick over her. (I am using 3rd person as that is how it feels, although I know I could correct it). Cognition as I know it through this 'program'.
Or by delaying; you can be one track, but you still don't have to arrive to X action in Y time, the time is something that's very up to you (and in situations you just don't have the time?
Ah, but 1 year olds don't have a concept of time. If I am understanding correctly. Neither speeding up or slowing down. Am I understanding correctly Cashew?
For me... It takes doing the opposite, gaining distance, to allow me to address what is behind the impulse in the first place.
I understand this for other triggers. And perhaps this is one of Scouts blue/not blue things, which I would expect from a 1 year old perspective. So if I were to be brought into the house (which has happened when this first started with me), I would respond like a feral cat and then drop for days. I think it may have perhaps exacerbated the problem. There was a time that I would tie myself to the bed so I wouldn't run out in the winter and curl up outside and freeze. Is there a green here I am not seeing?
Blue - outside hiding
Not Blue - inside retraumatizing myself
Green - ?