I disagree that America is a socialist economy... as stated for the reasons others cited already. If it was... then the economy as a whole, meaning American society, would be primarily middle class and doing well. Low income would be a minority, and even those who were low income, would still have basic free health care for serious illness and be supported to some degree. Not just left homeless and abandoned.
Capitalism - it is what it is - and that is America's structure. So be it. The problem IMHO, is that that same structure was allowed to be implemented into the political makeup of the country. What scared me a little this election, was media stating that this was the most expensive election held. The most money ever was contributed and spent during this election. To me... that means the most favours / some huge favours that the donators are now going to be calling upon. They want their return on investment. That is the crux of the issue IMHO. You cannot have a political structure 'for' the country, when it is based on capitalism.
The country works to some degree on it, even though it's not the soundest economic models of all available. The problem though is that Government is not 'for the country' when it is also working from that model. Government must be funded by the people, by taxes, and limited. The big song and dance that occurs with US politics needs to be cut right back and limited to publicly funded minimal advertising to get their policies across. That way... the people elect based on policies and dump based on failure to implement policies effectively. They then know that their country policy isn't being screwed with to favour the rich, which is well known that it is for US under the current system. Governmental regulation to that level would remove a whole lot of America's problems IMHO, without changing social structure or the American belief system. Regulate the Government, then the country can be more independent, as the cultures belief system entails.
My perception is that the US Government is deregulating itself, and trying to regulate the people. When in fact based on US constitutional beliefs, the Government should be regulated heavily so that the people maintain their claimed 'freedoms' and such.
Consumption tax sounds like GST here. A flat 10% tax on all goods and services. Saying that, that would not be enough to sustain any country. Our country still has income tax applied at a percentage basis to a maximum of, I think about 49 cents in the dollar for high income. That way, anyone under a certain amount pay zero tax, then when you reach taxation threshold, you pay about 30 cents in the dollar, and the more you earn the more you pay, until you reach the level of maximum income tax.
To be perfectly honest, even if America moved to a single consumption tax, it would need to be a balanced amount of the current system, if not slightly more, to help the country get out of its debt. If you had a GST system, stripping income taxes, it would need to be around 20 - 25% on goods and services consumed. That still wouldn't remove other things though like land taxes and such, which are different requirements to fund different issues.
To be perfectly honest, those who think any president they elect can change the country in four years for the better, you have to be seriously kidding yourself IMO. A country doesn't reflect change that quickly. A Government implements policy and it can takes years to measure that single change. It can take a decade to measure a single change in policy. You can take a country backwards in a short time. George Bush is the classic example of that. He destroyed the US economy in his first term, then the country put him back in to finish it of.
For those talking about the US stock market drop... that had nothing to do with the US, it had to do with Europe figures being released with downgraded forecasts and projections. The GFC is just now hitting Germany's economy, for instance... being the largest fiscal EU economy. They've been using their reserves to bail out other EU economies. Now they're in the crap because the slowdown has hit them.
That is why the US stock exchange, and others globally, are dropping upon opening of markets. Not because of the US elections.
This is my point about a global economy. What affects one country drastically can snowball to affect others, as all countries are lending out to others in which they obtain interest. The economic structure is like a big banking system. AAA countries lend to lesser rated countries and obtain a higher return interest rate. Countries banks borrows from AAA countries to pay the least interest, yet lend their monies to the economy at higher interest to make money. This continues on and on...
When one falls over significantly, suddenly the stone in the pond creates ripples that get bigger and bigger as they flow outwards.