personally i think there was one hell of a difference between the 1st gulf war and the second
the first being the threat of biological and chemical warfair having all those injections prior deployment and more when we got over there. i served with the rhf who responsible for building the pow camp. a rather heavy bergen with chemical suits, respirator always close by, ammo, rations which being brit were crap. scuds going off all over the place, tempormental chemical monitors, being woken up gas, gas, gas panic stricken to get the respirator on asap and putting on chemical suits. it was relentless and on several or mostly false alarms which took a while for the adrenaline to calm down. the land war and the liberation of kuwait. heading up the devils highway so many civilians caught up in the fire fight, burning bodies limbs scattered all over the place.
on a more serious note i think is saddam had chemicals there would have been a hell of alot more casualties because the theory was there how to survive but i dont beleive for one moment we could have survived. even buddy buddy senario who was going to break the seal of respirator then put it back on while your buddy was standing ready with his combo pen incase you took on the chemical symptoms.
the whole thing left me quite cynical about the war and the chemicals which he was supposed to have had didnt. then on route to bahgdad saddam announces a cease fire. why did we take him on why didnt we just go and get the job done only to be there a decade later.