- Post starter
- Admin
- #25
anthony
Founder
It's amazing how drastic things change between female and male matches. When I took the above picture of the Andy Murray game, there was a female match first. The stands were about 1/4 full, and this is a paid reserved seating stadium. It went to about 1/2 just before the game started, and then by half way through the first set it was full, barely an empty seat. When it ended, which was for Errani to play, back to about a 1/4 full.
I have to admit, watching a female match vs male is like watching a slow motion, amateurish game of tennis vs tennis on steroids, the ball just missing the net with the power being hit, and the intensity of shots being made is just insane. The female games are actually pretty lazy in comparison to the male games. I guess that has more to do with athleticism and genetics of male vs female muscle mass... but now seeing it for my own eyes, I appreciate the differences.
I still like the female games, hence I watched them and will continue to watch them. The upper level ladies do put more into their play, hence a better quality of game. The lower ranked ones... not so much.
I'm going back this weekend now... so much to do in there its just not funny.
I have to admit, watching a female match vs male is like watching a slow motion, amateurish game of tennis vs tennis on steroids, the ball just missing the net with the power being hit, and the intensity of shots being made is just insane. The female games are actually pretty lazy in comparison to the male games. I guess that has more to do with athleticism and genetics of male vs female muscle mass... but now seeing it for my own eyes, I appreciate the differences.
I still like the female games, hence I watched them and will continue to watch them. The upper level ladies do put more into their play, hence a better quality of game. The lower ranked ones... not so much.
I'm going back this weekend now... so much to do in there its just not funny.