To be honest with myself and all of you, my abuse started when I was an infant. So, Iike many other aspects of "who I am", it is conditionally prefaced on having been abused so young and by both sexes. And therefore, I have no way of knowing "who I would have been" had I never been subjected to such abuse in the first place. A loss that deeply hurts.
With that said, previously I had allows self-identified as "an asexual gay female" (desire, sexual orientation, gender), but that was based on the prevailing definition of gender, which last I read, was being further questioned for the DSM V).
More recently though, the more I think, the more I am confused and conflicted. As is exists now, the socially constructed definition of gender leaves us with a gender binary classification based primarily on "external" physical features, either male or female. However, I believe, as do many others who have argued for DSM changes, that gender relies more heavily on one's "internal" identity and resides along a gender conintuum, ie none of us is either all male or all female, but a beautiful and unique blending of both.
In addition, as is exists today, the socially constructed definition of sexual orientation leaves us with three categorical classifications based primarily on the binary gender of the individual as well as the binary gender that that individual prefers to intimately engaged with, be it straight, bisexual, or gay. However, if, as I believe, gender does reside along a continuum, then so does sexual orientation. So then how do we self-identify "who we are and who we love"? It's not so easy for me to do now as it seemed to be before? - it's much murkier now, but then so are we and our most intimate relationships.
I hope this has not offended anyone, it is only my opinion and my confusion. If yours differs or is less ambiguous than mine, I am sincerely respectful and indeed happy that you know "who you are" - it is significant. So with a little bit of humor and some serious soul searching, I would have to self-identify as "an asexual, who prefers a gender neutral person without a penis, and is a gender neutral person without a penis" (desire, conditional sexual orientation, conditional gender). Wow! :)
All I really know for sure, is that "The quality of the relationship is more important than the gender of the people that comprise it!"
But I haven't answered your question or mine. I do believe, like everything else, that the repeated traumas while young have assuredly altered me, be it directly or indirectly. And by that, I have to assume it may have altered my self-identified gender/preference to some extent, just as it eliminated my desire and influenced the clothes I wear and how I chose to wear them (more masculine than feminine and all covered and buttoned up). However, unlike my desire and my clothes, I do not believe that PTSD has altered my self-identified gender or sexual preference.
Still wondering "who I am"...
Alex (also gender neutral)