Greetings,
Though exceedingly difficult, paced disclosure is best. A hallmark of one bearing trauma legacies plus much rejection suffered is the conviction that further hurt can be avoided if we contractually 'cull the field' of all those poised to hurt us further. In my experience, such an orientation frightens away otherwise reasoned prospects. Best perhaps to script tiny aspects of trauma-impacted identity with the promise of lending pertinent details as and if a comfort level is established...
-
A dating profile isn't written in a day and forgotten, while the best tend to evolve reflecting the capacity of an individual to creatively engage life whatever the circumstance or circumstances have shaped (even impacted) them. A hard balance for us surely, but for exposing ourselves a bit the expectation too is that we might in turn lend value to the life of another. With this in mind, how might a profile be written to shine light on the positive potentiality of your presence within a relationship? At some core level, this has to be the focus.
We are people, we are distinct individuals displaying differing levels of resilience to whatever has impacted us, although online within the space of a dating profile we equate to a quick interpersonal advertisement. The advertisement must then at least be engaging rather than serve as notice of someone who might be further abused. I know all this is terribly difficult, but somehow, somewhere you must sequester and project forth aspects of self that you view as positive and that others may in turn recognize as positive. Though a cliche of sorts, if we don't telegraph that we respect ourselves or imagine ourselves worthy of respect, worthy of love, a selfish and impersonal presence might be visited upon us for this oversight.
-
All the hazards of para-social relationships apply with regards to online dating sites. People may not be who they claim to be, whereas others might apply standards to others that they cannot possibly meet themselves. Some (for better, but also for worse) lend dimension to facets of self that aren't strictly representative of who they are on the street, in the workplace, and face-to-face. Hard it is to determine if any chemistry exists short of meeting, and so terribly deflating it can be to register that little spark exists when a live meeting is risked.
All this said, do not strictly discount the option of trying. Many sites exist, some tailored to particular demographics with screening mechanisms that might (or may not) improve chances to communicate with those like-inclined. Also, please consider local activity groups where the formal focus may be the activity versus the overheated experience of a 'meet market' singles group. Low-risk, low-expectation comfort established with the opposite sex (or same as suits you) is the foundation upon which trust and further delicate risk taking may launched from. Such is easier in groups, while for a period I tried to attend something via meetup.com on a weekly basis to drag myself out into public. Assertion is needed though, for people won't necessarily rush up to us even if we were the most eligible people extant! Kind regards...
M.