• We are a multilingual website again. Read the notice about this.
  • Understand AI use at MyPTSD: all AI use is explained in our AI help page. AI use is by choice here. It exists if you want it, but does nothing unless you choose to use it.

Hope For The Holidays - Yes, Ptsd Is Curable

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's a nice article but every time I seen the word doctor, I just got sicker and sicker to my stomach. They are all liers! I'll never trust another doctor again, much less ever go see one!
 
I had to stop reading the article at the paragraph where it was basically said that if a person can talk about their trauma with adequate feelings there is a good chance they won't develop PTSD. Who decides how much feeling is adequate? And also I've had PTSD with complex trauma for pretty much my whole life. I can indeed discuss my traumatic experiences and I can do it with emotion. I was able to do that before my diagnosis and I still can. So even after being diagnosed with PTSD I've been able to talk about it. It's triggering. It's hard. I hate it and it makes my nightmares more frequent. So for me I'm not sure that I can completely agree with the article. I wish it were true. But where I'm at right now I struggle to believe it. Whether I'm right or wrong it's where I'm at right now.
 
Error in first paragraph. Title is about CURING, first paragraph discusses RECOVERING. Fail. Curing and recovering are two different things.

Later on... " In fact, if survivors can talk about traumatic events with appropriate feeling and clear, sequential memory, it's a good bet they're not going to acquire PTSD anyway." Uhm, according to WHAT fact?!? This is NOT a fact!

I believe we can heal but I don't believe there is a cure. A "cure" would put us at a pre-trauma state and this is simply not possible. The truth is that we will always require a higher level of self-care and will have a lower stress threshold, thus being more susceptible to retraumatization.

I think it's interesting that the article doesn't even mention anyone who has been completely cured by her suggestions. Drops in symptoms are mentioned, but this does not equate to a cure. The article fails to support it's main premise.

Healing and recovering are possible, curing is not.
 
Later on... " In fact, if survivors can talk about traumatic events with appropriate feeling and clear, sequential memory, it's a good bet they're not going to acquire PTSD anyway." Uhm, according to WHAT fact?!? This is NOT a fact!

I believe we can heal but I don't believe there is a cure. A "cure" would put us at a pre-trauma state and this is simply not possible. The truth is that we will always require a higher level of self-care and will have a lower stress threshold, thus being more susceptible to retraumatization.

That paragraph got you too. As soon as I read that I was done reading. I totally agree with what you said about healing recovering and "cure". It's why I think this kind of article has to be approached with caution. But then I'm always hypervigilant so I do most things with a lot of caution.
 
Thank you for posting the article. Your intentions are good. The article reminded me to do more of the mentioned therapies, and it made me grateful for having discovered them, in past years.

What I take: it is helpful to share that there are options and complements to traditional therapy. Mindbody therapies have really helped me, especially Therapeutic Touch, Massage, Acupuncture, the Alexander Technique (not mentioned), and Hypnotherapy.

What I leave: PTSD is curable.
What I learned: inaccurate articles make the on-line news.
What I would add: the amicable and respectful relationship between the practitioner and the receiver, is what helps the techniques work well, since it cultivates trust and relaxation.
 
Last edited:
said that if a person can talk about their trauma with adequate feelings
I actually didn't read it that way Blackbird but can see why someone would. I believe they were saying that someone straight from a traumatic experience that has organised memory and appropriate emotion is unlikely to have PTS. You are talking about years later and after much change.

I struggle to imagine someone with PTS leaving the 9/11 site with organised memory and appropriate emotion getting PTS. I imagine most would be strangely calm or in a state of obvious trauma. Most would find it difficult to speak the whole experience through coherently. Note coherently. You may have full recall of all the trauma and be able to speak about it in a coherent and moderately emotional state but could you do that straight afterwards?

I agree the word cure is unfortunate but I think the point is still very important. People go around saying PTSD is incurable and that is way more misunderstood in my opinion. I suspect there are a fair amount of people not getting treatment because there is no point as it is "incurable".

I also think they make a very good point about ignorant therapists forcing people into talk therapy straight after trauma and the damage it does. The research says it should no be done but it seems therapists are often ignorant when it comes to trauma. And what they are saying is what is needed post trauma is to calm the body and mind and help the person feel safe. Obviously things such as massage wouldn't work on certain traumas.

Other than the word curable I don't see anything that isn't valuable here and I suspect the use of the word is probably a reaction to all the "there is nothing to be done as it is incurable" brigade. In every other way they are saying it is treatable which it is. In clinical terms if someones symptoms drop below a certain level they would no longer have PTSD. Clinical fact.
 
Last edited:
Having read Belleruth Naparstek's book Invisible Heroes, I think this article does her own approach a disservice by bringing in the word "incurable". It's eye-catching and this is journalism after all (don't start me on journalism), but it isn't helpful. I think she's using it in the wider context of treatment and healing, but I think it's the wrong word to use. It only makes it inconsistent because the article itself rightly doesn't claim any "cure". Her book certainly doesn't. It's about healing and recovery, and how - as Abstract says - a) there are effective approaches/treatments and b) talking too soon can be damaging.

I do see the distinction between being able to talk about something afterwards, or not. I was once on a plane that had to make a controlled crash landing and we all thought we were going to die, but it didn't cause (or add to) my PTSD because of what happened afterwards. It wasn't a secret, it wasn't shameful, I had no guilt, other people had been through it too, and when I had to get on another plane a few days later I was given special arrangements which included a crew member with me for the whole flight.

It wasn't that I did talk much about it, but I knew what had happened and my reactions were appropriate. I wasn't denying, minimising, suppressing or distorting it. For example, when checking in for the later flight I was shaking and sweating from fear and I had to explain that I'd been on the plane that crash landed at [location] on [day]. I think that's all that's meant by having the narrative, being able to talk about it and having appropriate reactions. The PTS/PTSD version would be being unable to get the words out, dissociating, fragmenting, dismissing it etc.

Although I had no idea about trauma then, I now see that getting the later flight and going through that somatic processing while safe was the best thing to do. Sitting in a room discussing it with someone wouldn't have been helpful - in fact I never did need that, other than telling friends. Thinking about it now, massage would have been wonderful at the time (for this).
 
It makes more sense now. I am afraid I didn't recognise the authors name and didn't see it on the article until I went back now to look for it. If I am understanding, they took this article from Belleruth Naparstek's blog and stuck a sensational heading on it. There is no mention of "cure" inside.

Looking at it again in that context it all gels. Interesting too that she mentions not getting people to discuss the trauma straight afterwards. See Anthony's https://www.myptsd.com/threads/expe...lling-immediately-after-trauma-pre-ptsd.7576/

If you want to see what journalists can do then look at this:
This the interesting thing about journalism
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Donation drives

2026 Donation Goal

Goal
$1,800.00
Earned
$910.00
This donation drive ends in
0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds
  50.6%

Trending content

Featured content

Back
Top Bottom