Sometimes I think I'm really good at seeing problems ... but I'm not good at being sure if it's a "real" problem or just my problem.
With people problems, I think a lot of that feeling has to do with my interpretation of what another person's intent is OR the fear that it's perfectly normal and I'm just missing something and/or being paranoid/irrational.
And THAT second part is crazy-making. Literally. It's like I'm my own abuser's understudy ...
I really like the point made about two kinds of problems and three possible solutions. That feels manageable.
What I'm also learning is that when it comes to people problems, assertiveness doesn't deal so much with right, wrong, fair, or unfair. I've been stuck on the "is he/she right?" or "is it fair of me to ask ...?"
In reality, it's just about saying some form of: "[this thing] is something that feels bad, and I need [that thing] instead or we need to find another solution that works for both of us. I'd really like to work together to resolve this, but if that's not possible I have the option of resolving it myself by walking away."
It doesn't matter if [this thing] is technically right or wrong or a "problem" by anyone else's definition. Seems simple ... but it blew my mind for a couple of days.
And situational problems? They don't usually get to me. I think it's easier for me to accept those problems because there's no one blame (or to be a victim of). Then again, I don't believe in a benevolent or malevolent universe or that "the universe hates me" ... I think it's just ... the universe, blind and indifferent.
I think that was a great question!! How someone approaches the answer is telling. I didn't even think about situational problems when I read it, ergo, for me, the underlying belief is that "problems" involve other people, fault, and intention. I did not know that about myself when I started replying.
Thanks for posting!!