You are right, in some sense, it is! But it was meant as a friendly advise because I do percieve her theory as harmful. Peptites are very real. Very superficailly put, they make strings of protien in our bodys. There are neuro-peptides aswell.
I took it as friendly of course. I know you were trying to make me aware that you find her messages harmful. I was researching peptides earlier as well, and I can see why you would think she is full of it. peptides running through a persons brain causing us to continue to suffer doesn't really add up to what the definition of a peptide is. Either she got the terminology wrong or she is spouting misinformation for some kind of agenda.
Again, I find that statement to, maybe not shift the blame, but to shift the control from the target to the narc. Even when you are not interacting with them they are still in control. Either way, you have no control. I do not accept that premise.
I think if you accept that we are energetic beings as well as physical, it is possible that narcs pull our strings on an unconscious level. Maybe it has nothing to do with peptides or chemicals in the brain, but I do think that when we have energy cords attached to someone who drains us of 'narcissistic supply' then it can explain why we go running back to people who are bad for us. It can't just be our destructive side that makes us do this. We still have control, but they can be very hard to resist not going back for another serve.
This is a part of her message that I do not accept. It implies that they have planted some sort of 'chip' in your head (calling it a peptide) and their control over you remains. It is activated when ever you think about the narc and what they have done to you.
Why is that hard to accept though? It's the same premise as someone who is addicted to a drug that they know is bad for them...they try and resist but it keeps calling to them, and they feel so out of control that they aren't able to say no. If you are addicted to an abusive relationship, even though you know it's bad for you, you still go back and don't seem to be able to stop yourself. If there is an actual physiological reason why we do that then it would explain a lot.
You now cause your own suffering, you have no control over your own suffering so you best not think about or speak out about the abuse.
Hmmm, I don't really see where you are coming from here. It seems like you are adding 2 and 2 and coming up with 7. If there is something chemical affecting your brain and causing you suffering, then that is out of your control. It may not be pleasant to think that you have no control, but nevertheless, that is the reality. Just because you cannot control it does not mean you cannot speak out about it. Often the victims own fear of not being believed, or shame at being under the persons thrall or a hundred other reasons is what stops them from speaking out. Perhaps I have misunderstood what you meant here?
So if you still suffer, you are now causing it to yourself. What a smart way of keeping you not only scilent about what was done to you, but also guilty if you even think about it and get upset. That is what I mean by fear - based and blame-shifting tactics.
I never got that impression from her speeches or writing. Melanie always seemed to place emphasis on showing understanding, which sounded genuine, and reminded people that she was where they are now, and I found that comforting. I'm sure many people did. I'm pretty onto blame shifting and as someone who has had gaslighting, blame shifting and other mind games imposed on them from a young age, I can spot it a mile away. I didn't pick it up in her case. I guess we will have to agree to disagree. It's possible she isn't all that she professes, but I just don't see where you are coming from with the blame shifting.