• We are a multilingual website again. Read the notice about this.
  • Understand AI use at MyPTSD: all AI use is explained in our AI help page. AI use is by choice here. It exists if you want it, but does nothing unless you choose to use it.

Sexual Assault Tea, consent, and the marriage bed

Status
Not open for further replies.
he kept saying that I wanted these things.
He was wrong about that though. But, that's the kind of thing people like that tell themselves. And, maybe, they actually believe it. Believing it doesn't make it's true. If you'd ACTUALLY wanted it, none of this would be an issue. Would it? That's not a place where people really second guess themselves. Not that I'm aware of.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C j
talking about committed relationships. But it's still considered consensual because it wasn't stopped.

But its not. I saw this part of the tea consent "don't try to force it down their throat". That is what he did by putting you under threat. No matter how far past that threat was.

I was in a committed relationship (my ex) and I do see how the tea consent works even in that comitted relationship. But maybe its just how my brain works. I don't know. It wasn't a healthy relationship but I did think it was through most of it, he was abusive as well, and I WAS in love with him so I don't know.
 
If you'd ACTUALLY wanted it, none of this would be an issue. Would it? That's not a place where people really second guess themselves. Not that I'm aware of.
No. but I consented or at the very least I didn't say NO or fight back. That's where the whole crap with escalation comes in. Assumed relationships. Etc.
Most of the known world believes that if you didn't say no, then it was a-ok!
I feel like I'm going in circles and I might be at this point.:cautious:
 
No. but I consented or at the very least I didn't say NO or fight back
Sometimes, because I'm not very good a seeing the various shades of things, my T has me make sort of a rainbow of words. Going from one extreme to the other. To me, it looks like you have the start of one of those right there. There are words that can go in between, but all those things are different colors.

Consent........Didn't say "NO!"..... Fought back.
 
OK. I have a question @desiderata310 . How does the could have/should have/would have change your options now? Are the choices you have now limited by the choices you may or may not have had before?
 
Trying to squish a whole, messy relationship into the tea analogy just doesn't work. I'd go so far as to say that the tea analogy really does make a mockery of how complex communication between humans is, in any situation. And throwing in the issue of "Was I complicit?" really does highlight the limits of the tea analogy when it comes to relationships, especially abusive relationships.

In domestic situations, the concept of "abuse" is often a more accurate way of understanding what was going on than trying to assess which night was consensual sex and which night wasn't. Because a relationship isn't a series of finite, single-act sexual encounters night after night between strangers.

using analogies: say he suggests you have tea. If you know from previous experience that declining this offer is too darn risky so you say yes? That's not consent. It's not even 'complicit' in the way I'm hearing you use the term.

Does the bank teller being heldup at gunpoint become 'complicit' in the bank robbery because they decide handing over the cash is the best option? No.

Relationships are even more complicated, because he hasn't just walked in off the street and heldup the bank teller as a one off here. If he's held up the bank teller before, or if the bank teller recognises him and knows from previous dealings that this guy is usually toting a gun and may pull it on me if I don't just hand over the cash even before he's asked?? Still not complicit.
 
How does the could have/should have/would have change your options now? Are the choices you have now limited by the choices you may or may not have had before?
I SWEAR I am not trying to be dense but I am not picking up what you are putting down.
I don't understand the question.
 
using analogies: say he suggests you have tea. If you know from previous experience that declining this offer is too darn risky so you say yes? That's not consent. It's not even 'complicit' in the way I'm hearing you use the term.
I love this analogy you just used to put it into perspective. I was in a sexually abusive relationship as well and there were some things that I would say no to every time however, my words were ignored and sometimes I was forced by physical force but most of the time my words were just ignored and eventually I stopped saying no because I was conditioned to being ignored anyways...he then used that as a way of saying "see I knew you like it..." No...umm you have just conditioned me that you would force me either physically or just do it anyways so the above post really rings true...that's correct that is not the same as consent even though I eventually stopped saying no! @desiderata310 I'm really sorry this has happened to you and yes relationships, marriage, sex gets very messy and complicated. I for one am trying to sort out a lot of the same questions you had asked in the beginning of this thread...When does the line cross from just trying to "fulfill wifely duties/compliance/not to ensue an argument (which I wasn't allowed to leave the bed in the morning without initiating sex or else my husband would get very angry with me..) It's just so complicated...it wasn't until years after I left him did I even realize it was sexually abusive and not in any way ok... It's hard because there are some people out there who assert that wives or husbands cant be sexually abused and if you are married pretty much your partner should be allowed to have sex with you whenever they want. My husband would often say that my various body parts belonged to him....I feel like unfortunately things are getting so twisted, yes we are supposed to try to give and take and sometimes "give" sex when we don't necessarily feel like it to please our partner. I think the keyword here is "give" of our own free will as a gift. Just like we may clean up after our partners or say wash their car when we don't want to and the feeling we get afterwards is very different then being coerced or forced into doing those acts. I hope that made sense and I didn't go on a rant too much? lol
 
If you decide you were 'complicit' how does that change what you do now? If you decide you weren't, what do you do now?
Honestly?
It changes a lot of things in a very deep place for me. This is banging around at core beliefs. (Why I was happy to take this wide and not get too specific in my own trauma)And threatens things in ways I've not fully explored just yet.

Neither option is really great.
If I was complicit that reinforces some things I know to be true about myself
If I was not complicit, this makes what happened a trauma that is too life defining.
Kind of a public thread for that question but I hope that answers your question.

Neither option feels great but I've gone rounds over this in the last 4-5 days.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Donation drives

2026 Donation Goal

Goal
$1,800.00
Earned
$910.00
This donation drive ends in
0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds
  50.6%

Trending content

Featured content

Back
Top Bottom