Thanks for the heads up,
@Lemontree!
And
@Solara I am SURE you didn't mean to include me in that "you all.";) I'm pretty sure I've never said anything nice about PTSD. And I'm speculating here, not advocating a position (tho it might sound like it since I am not so good at writing sentences in the hypothetical mode.)
I think in hindsight that my old thread was probably more applicable to Structural Dissociation than PTSD. Although the general theory (which is a pet theory of mine, I didn't make it up, but I subscribe to it) that people are romantically attracted to those with "equal and opposite" neuroses would predict that if people fall in love
after one of them has PTSD the non-PTSD person has some equal and opposite problem that needs to be healed. But PTSD takes people differently in some ways, so maybe it would be more accurate to say that we choose people with opposite coping strategies, or habitual response patterns?
Here is an example: My H externalized his anger in a big way, and pretty much turned any negative emotion into angry emotional expression. I, by contrast, never got angry about anything. I would do polite moral indignation on rare occasions, but anger? personal anger? Never. As we have both gotten better he has gotten ALOT less angry acting, and is feeling a much wider range of negative emotions and expressing them as such. I have learned to notice when I am angry (and not just stuff it in a nano-second) and am working on expressing it appropriately. I think he is getting the better end of this deal from the first person experience point of view. What does this have to do with PTSD? (or SD) Nothing necessarily, now that I say it. People without PTSD or SD have these patterns too. But maybe we are attracted to people with unprocessed trauma? Or neglect? Maybe trauma attracts neglect? It would be good to know if it did.
So I wonder if there is a profile? Because I had this theory before we met, when it became clear that he was suffering from a serious mental illness (which I TOTALLY did not see for the first two years) I had a choice - I could give up my theory and leave, or stick to my theory and stay and work on figuring out what was wrong with ME and support I'm as he got better. I thought I was fine. Everyone I could think of thought I was fine. The evidence of the romantic relationships (married to an asperger's guy the first time around, and a history of boyfriends who weren't... well anyhow) said I was NOT fine. Of course, in my family we are always fine. Always. It took me ages (decades anyhow) to even be able to see how extremely strange my parents are.
I think I am much less crazy now than I have ever been. I could be wrong, but I am at least a lot more aware and do less inexplicable things than I used to.
Relationships, on this theory, are the perfect crucible for healing our emotional hurts and developing our characters. That's the theory. I find it useful and interesting. Others may not.
When I wrote the other thread I was looking for clues to help me solve the puzzle of what was wrong with ME, since I'd been trained to systematically
not notice that anything even might be wrong.