This is interesting post...
I read few, actually a lot of the response s but not all.
I wonder few things that are said:
Labels are culture based and hardly objective across humanity. Research results often change when new technology or new knowledge is found.
Reaction to childhood trauma to get cluster b is not surprising actually should be expected imho. NPD is so vilified but yet probably we would not have this technology and million other things if everyone follows the rules of the day. Most research on this from what I have seen they do not have ndp subjects but use more theoritcal basis.
Not having basic trust doesn't mean not having intelligence or wisdom or compassion or empathy...it just means we do not have one thing ...and it entails harder way of gaining what we need.
I am summarizing what I read and digested so far.
I think probably IMHO the most challenging outcome of big trauma is losing subjective self and seeing only how others see us but even then one can learn or become aware or keep living with that point view disability. I really love human resilience in the face of intimate adversary.
Knowing your core issue is trust, I would ask what are your positive compensation to make you survive so long?
It is like losing a leg in a war, did you build your upper muscle better? Or being blind but having strong textile? Do you know that? And can you accept that for now until new knowledge or experience comes along or have hope?
All these statements are my opinions here I have no back up data. What I learned is that it is not what broke but how creatively we mend it or look at it to ponder mending.. hence we found each other here.
Extremely valuable discussion.
I read few, actually a lot of the response s but not all.
I wonder few things that are said:
Labels are culture based and hardly objective across humanity. Research results often change when new technology or new knowledge is found.
Reaction to childhood trauma to get cluster b is not surprising actually should be expected imho. NPD is so vilified but yet probably we would not have this technology and million other things if everyone follows the rules of the day. Most research on this from what I have seen they do not have ndp subjects but use more theoritcal basis.
Not having basic trust doesn't mean not having intelligence or wisdom or compassion or empathy...it just means we do not have one thing ...and it entails harder way of gaining what we need.
I am summarizing what I read and digested so far.
I think probably IMHO the most challenging outcome of big trauma is losing subjective self and seeing only how others see us but even then one can learn or become aware or keep living with that point view disability. I really love human resilience in the face of intimate adversary.
Knowing your core issue is trust, I would ask what are your positive compensation to make you survive so long?
It is like losing a leg in a war, did you build your upper muscle better? Or being blind but having strong textile? Do you know that? And can you accept that for now until new knowledge or experience comes along or have hope?
All these statements are my opinions here I have no back up data. What I learned is that it is not what broke but how creatively we mend it or look at it to ponder mending.. hence we found each other here.
Extremely valuable discussion.