Until the last DSM came out a year or two ago, BPD in the previous DSM IV was said to be caused by early childhood trauma. That has just recently changed.
Even now, experts are not saying you are born with it (genetic), they are just not saying that it is caused by this early childhood trauma. Having experienced trauma is now not part of the criteria to diagnose BPD. I don't have DSM in front of me, but I believe it still can be a learned behavior. Changing this one factor is a real game changer that I am still having trouble wrapping my head around.
My oldest daughter who is 40 is BiPolar and BPD. OMG she was a handful all of her life, but when she hit her teens, it was pure hell. She fit the diagnosis then and now still. Her father was bi-polar and very abusive toward me, therefore she witnessed enough abuse to be traumatized and meet old criteria for BPD.
When she was 11, I was remarried to a calm man and had 2 more daughters that are 18 mo apart. The first was a God Send. If I knew how my oldest would be before having 2 more-I would have had my tubes tied for certain. But I didn't. The second daughter was the calmest baby, a real pleaser, excelled at all she did. Geez, when she was 18 months old after reading stories and me telling her it was bed time, she would run down the hall and get in her crib and grab her blanky ready for sleep. She was the most well behaved and easy kid ever. The next was too pretty much, but more of a loner and a huge climber-getting into things, cutting her hair and dolls hair and silly things, nothing really of concern.
When the older one was only like 2 and 3, she knew she could not take a toy away from baby sister, so she would manipulate her and my husband thought she was so smart. It was bad behavior that the first time you see you might find humor, but then you put an end to that, arranging it not to work for her. She did this with playmates too. He thought she was SO smart. I think as they spend time away from us more, it is less evident. She hit teens and OMG here comes extreme manipulation at any cost. She was worse than the first except she never went down the wrong roads such as harmful people or drugs. She did the other things, playing people against each other, and much within the family. She is smart enough to know when to cut it too. She became an attorney after she bled her family dry of every bit of finance and energy she could gain, then estranged herself. The 3rd daughter is definitely not BPD-not a sign. But this second one-I knew she had experienced no trauma that I could possibly think of as I was over protective in certain ways and she just wasn't exposed.
I would have pegged her behavior as BPD from 15 on at least, except no trauma. Now that they have changed all of this, it is possible. I don't think its genetic though. I think it might come from a parent who is over pleasing. I was a neglected child so it was very important for me to be super mom. Well that did not work out so well for me I guess. The only Grace is that by the 3rd daughter, there was nobody left to manipulate or it didn't work because the adults were already the first two's puppets.
Also possible that it is genetic. Sure have had some unnecessary drama in own life, self created, but ended in teens when expected. I recall doing some things in middle school that could be considered this, except I felt bad about it and ceased that behavior as soon as it felt safe too. (stemmed from being bullied because I was new girl at school)
Given the new criteria, I do think my second daughter is BPD. She is a bully, a liar, manipulates people very smoothly. She is what is known and a high functioning BPD. I rejected that diagnosis for so long, but now do believe it is valid.
This may help understand or make things more confusing. I hope it helps in understanding viable scenarios.
Even now, experts are not saying you are born with it (genetic), they are just not saying that it is caused by this early childhood trauma. Having experienced trauma is now not part of the criteria to diagnose BPD. I don't have DSM in front of me, but I believe it still can be a learned behavior. Changing this one factor is a real game changer that I am still having trouble wrapping my head around.
My oldest daughter who is 40 is BiPolar and BPD. OMG she was a handful all of her life, but when she hit her teens, it was pure hell. She fit the diagnosis then and now still. Her father was bi-polar and very abusive toward me, therefore she witnessed enough abuse to be traumatized and meet old criteria for BPD.
When she was 11, I was remarried to a calm man and had 2 more daughters that are 18 mo apart. The first was a God Send. If I knew how my oldest would be before having 2 more-I would have had my tubes tied for certain. But I didn't. The second daughter was the calmest baby, a real pleaser, excelled at all she did. Geez, when she was 18 months old after reading stories and me telling her it was bed time, she would run down the hall and get in her crib and grab her blanky ready for sleep. She was the most well behaved and easy kid ever. The next was too pretty much, but more of a loner and a huge climber-getting into things, cutting her hair and dolls hair and silly things, nothing really of concern.
When the older one was only like 2 and 3, she knew she could not take a toy away from baby sister, so she would manipulate her and my husband thought she was so smart. It was bad behavior that the first time you see you might find humor, but then you put an end to that, arranging it not to work for her. She did this with playmates too. He thought she was SO smart. I think as they spend time away from us more, it is less evident. She hit teens and OMG here comes extreme manipulation at any cost. She was worse than the first except she never went down the wrong roads such as harmful people or drugs. She did the other things, playing people against each other, and much within the family. She is smart enough to know when to cut it too. She became an attorney after she bled her family dry of every bit of finance and energy she could gain, then estranged herself. The 3rd daughter is definitely not BPD-not a sign. But this second one-I knew she had experienced no trauma that I could possibly think of as I was over protective in certain ways and she just wasn't exposed.
I would have pegged her behavior as BPD from 15 on at least, except no trauma. Now that they have changed all of this, it is possible. I don't think its genetic though. I think it might come from a parent who is over pleasing. I was a neglected child so it was very important for me to be super mom. Well that did not work out so well for me I guess. The only Grace is that by the 3rd daughter, there was nobody left to manipulate or it didn't work because the adults were already the first two's puppets.
Also possible that it is genetic. Sure have had some unnecessary drama in own life, self created, but ended in teens when expected. I recall doing some things in middle school that could be considered this, except I felt bad about it and ceased that behavior as soon as it felt safe too. (stemmed from being bullied because I was new girl at school)
Given the new criteria, I do think my second daughter is BPD. She is a bully, a liar, manipulates people very smoothly. She is what is known and a high functioning BPD. I rejected that diagnosis for so long, but now do believe it is valid.
This may help understand or make things more confusing. I hope it helps in understanding viable scenarios.