Hi Pencil,
Glad you slept. Eventually.
I think there are some clues in what you wrote that elude to what I don't understand. Or that at least give me more understanding. Or piece together some of my understanding a bit better.
I am very familiar with conventional theory on resilience already where they list such things as having one close relationship or at least one person that one can go to; intelligence and I think a few other factors. They do not generally discuss a lot of what is described in the above excerpts.
people live on high alert all the tim
I think this is what I was wondering. If living on general high alert is something that could contribute. What I was thinking is coming into focus a little more clearly now and I am thinking there could be many different reasons to be on constant high alert. Other than having directly experiencing trauma that is, of course.
The kind of awful pervasive lack of safety you describe in South Africa would be a good example. As would neglect in a different way I think. And being a soldier in war regardless of if they were exposed to direct trauma in that context. And probably certain other jobs, possibly being in prison, etc etc.
However, at low levels of stress and trauma, vulnerabilities matter a great deal in determining whether the disorder will develop.
And I guess this is what I was wondering.
support from loved ones reduces cortisol secretion and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis activity (Barlow & Durand, 2012).
I think support must be the biggest protecting factor and the lack the biggest contributing factor other than the trauma so had put that aside when thinking about this thread but maybe what had not sunk in and connected the various parts is the various reasons why it is protective. If it lowers these stress hormones and
that is part of what has a protective function then it makes some sense that having them raised all the time would do the opposite. Of course support would do way more than that methinks.
And maybe maybe it is all like weighing up something. With some things adding a little more weight and others adding huge amounts until the scale breaks. And other personality factors etc add extra resistance or not. Does anyone think that is wrong?
Thanks again as that was actually quite helpful.