I also disagree that it’s dependent on whether or not the abuser was seeking sexual gratification. This is because, many times, especially when children are involved, SA is not about sexual attraction or arousal. It’s about power. SA is not sex. And people who abuse small children don’t think of it as sex. They think of it as a gaining of power.
Additionally, there are numerous situations where someone can be violated in very inappropriate ways that you may not be able to think of. For example, when I was 2 years and 10 months old, I had this urology test done to see why I was getting UTIs. The doctor egregiously hid many of the processes involved in the exam from my parents, and my mom wasn’t allowed in the room during it. The doctor lied and they would not be touching me down there at all, let alone putting things inside of me, which is what happened. Many men (nurses) held me down while others touched me and stuck things inside me. My mom only found out years later, when I was a bit older and opened up to her about it (I can still remember it). She was infuriated and wanted to sue the doctor, but the doctor was dead. Were the nurses who were following the doctor’s instructions seeking sexual gratification? No. Does that take away how I was violated? No.
And I mean, a family friend started molesting me at around the same time, and to be honest, I don’t think my little brain was very clearly able to tell the difference. Impact over intent, especially when it comes to violating children’s bodily autonomy.