radicalgratitude
Gold Member
Since it often happens without any witnesses present, sexual abuse is incredibly difficult to prove. Medical tests are used to look for evidence of sexual abuse in children. In an ideal world, these invasive procedures would confirm what the children know to be true. However research has indicated that these tests have consistently failed to provide the evidence needed.
In child sexual abuse, there is typically very little physical force involved. Instead, children may be coaxed or manipulated into participating in the activity. The abuser may know ways to abuse a child without leaving physical damage. The abuser may work to stimulate the sexual organs before penetration. In other words, the child often has feelings of arousal, leading to natural lubrication, which makes intercourse less painful. As a side note, this is a normal physiological response. Being aroused does not mean that the victim enjoyed it.
Even if the sexual abuse did injure the child, rapid healing takes place in the areas of the body that are typically affected by sexual abuse. The child’s genitals may heal completely. Even the hymen may restore and appear as if it was never ruptured to begin with. When there is a delayed disclosure, it is even more unlikely the signs of injury will be present during the examination.
Furthermore, an article titled Child Sexual Abuse Overall Assessment that was published in Sexual Abuse in Prepubertal Children and Adolescents cautions the following: “Although we are constantly learning more about the role and significance of medical aspects in suspected sexual abuse cases, the diagnosis ‘child sexual abuse’ primarily rests on the professionally and qualified obtained descriptive statements made by an abused child.” His assessment is congruent with a seven year study that was published in J Paediatr Child Health that concludes that physical symptoms have “no predictive value in the diagnosis of sexual abuse.” Since traditional medical tests fail to consistently confirm sexual abuse of minors, it is imprudent to rely on them.
In child sexual abuse, there is typically very little physical force involved. Instead, children may be coaxed or manipulated into participating in the activity. The abuser may know ways to abuse a child without leaving physical damage. The abuser may work to stimulate the sexual organs before penetration. In other words, the child often has feelings of arousal, leading to natural lubrication, which makes intercourse less painful. As a side note, this is a normal physiological response. Being aroused does not mean that the victim enjoyed it.
Even if the sexual abuse did injure the child, rapid healing takes place in the areas of the body that are typically affected by sexual abuse. The child’s genitals may heal completely. Even the hymen may restore and appear as if it was never ruptured to begin with. When there is a delayed disclosure, it is even more unlikely the signs of injury will be present during the examination.
Furthermore, an article titled Child Sexual Abuse Overall Assessment that was published in Sexual Abuse in Prepubertal Children and Adolescents cautions the following: “Although we are constantly learning more about the role and significance of medical aspects in suspected sexual abuse cases, the diagnosis ‘child sexual abuse’ primarily rests on the professionally and qualified obtained descriptive statements made by an abused child.” His assessment is congruent with a seven year study that was published in J Paediatr Child Health that concludes that physical symptoms have “no predictive value in the diagnosis of sexual abuse.” Since traditional medical tests fail to consistently confirm sexual abuse of minors, it is imprudent to rely on them.