Hi Springer! :) I may be misunderstanding of course. What do you suggest she do action wise at this point?she should protect herself foremost and lead by example.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hi Springer! :) I may be misunderstanding of course. What do you suggest she do action wise at this point?she should protect herself foremost and lead by example.
how would you feel if I said you couldn't go near my child as you have PTSD?
Prime-no I was trying to highlight that some members here are PTSD Sufferers and are condemning this man and the likelihood of potential access to his child due to his PTSD. I simply used what you posted as an example - I am sorry if I upset you as it was not my intention - I did say it wasn't personal and it was an example. I was highlighting the content being that Livy's Mom said he has PTSD and is an alcoholic not the fact that you quoted it to bring it to someone's attention.Nicolette, I posted this because Abstract said that Livy's Mom had not said it. That was all. Please don't read anything into it, as I was just giving Abstract the piece of information.
Yes, and still no court would be likely to rule against access to a child based on not turning up.... you are twisting my words through context.But in another thread you've stated that all people are responsible for their behavior and bad behavior, ptsd or not, is bad behavior.
What do you suggest she do action wise at this point?
I think that would be a good option Springer. Especially if he is a more reasonable person.I would say