- Admin
- #157
anthony
Founder
Goodluck Aj... all the best and I hope this works for you.
That is exactly the issue at hand...
People are being diagnosed with PTSD, by the book, if they have the symptoms for a single month or longer... yet empirical data clearly shows, approximately 60% - 80% of people who meet the diagnostic criteria for PTSD, will actually no longer have the symptoms or severity after 6 months. The results breakdown part of that after 3 months, but I am sticking to approximates here.
In reality, should the person have actually be diagnosed with PTSD so soon after a traumatic event? The evidence clearly demonstrates how normal these symptoms are to a traumatic event, and the majority fully recover without any treatment at all. Its only a minority that continue onwards, some fully recovering with treatment, some never fully recovering what is PTSD.
So yes... if you wanted to include "by the book" diagnosing of PTSD, then a good majority actually don't have what is deemed life PTSD vs. a normal human reaction to a traumatic event that fully recovers by itself, yet by a mental health professionals doctrine, they can label them with PTSD nonetheless.
You then have people who have been diagnosed with PTSD who, as you stated, actually don't have PTSD, instead have depression, panic attacks, agoraphobia instead... which may mimic or be confused as PTSD, but infact have 3 unique diagnosis and not PTSD. Misdiagnosis in mental health is quite extreme, to say the least, as its a "best guess" basis and done with no scientific data.
One thing that I wonder about is whether there are either different types of PTSD which may respond to the Chicago block differently, or if it is possible that some people are misdiagnosed and may have other anxiety conditions that may not be connected to the Stellate Ganglion action, but mimic PTSD?
That is exactly the issue at hand...
People are being diagnosed with PTSD, by the book, if they have the symptoms for a single month or longer... yet empirical data clearly shows, approximately 60% - 80% of people who meet the diagnostic criteria for PTSD, will actually no longer have the symptoms or severity after 6 months. The results breakdown part of that after 3 months, but I am sticking to approximates here.
In reality, should the person have actually be diagnosed with PTSD so soon after a traumatic event? The evidence clearly demonstrates how normal these symptoms are to a traumatic event, and the majority fully recover without any treatment at all. Its only a minority that continue onwards, some fully recovering with treatment, some never fully recovering what is PTSD.
So yes... if you wanted to include "by the book" diagnosing of PTSD, then a good majority actually don't have what is deemed life PTSD vs. a normal human reaction to a traumatic event that fully recovers by itself, yet by a mental health professionals doctrine, they can label them with PTSD nonetheless.
You then have people who have been diagnosed with PTSD who, as you stated, actually don't have PTSD, instead have depression, panic attacks, agoraphobia instead... which may mimic or be confused as PTSD, but infact have 3 unique diagnosis and not PTSD. Misdiagnosis in mental health is quite extreme, to say the least, as its a "best guess" basis and done with no scientific data.