- Post starter
- #85
As a more general thought, it's useful for me to use the Orphan Child archetype/personality trait as a reference point when looking at what people have said here. It helps me is in knowing what type of "child" I am. (Orphan Child is not a "bad" trait to have, by the way. Any trait has positive and less positive qualities. Orphan children can be resourceful, adventurous, independent-thinking and very good at taking care of themselves.)
Even if I had had decent parenting, I would probably never have been a puppies and princesses type child, or even much of a hugs and kisses child. I remember someone giving me a teddy bear when I was very little and even at the time I didn't see the point of it. I think that was my personality and not trauma related, I've heard a lot of people saying that a cuddly toy was one of their few comforts as an abused child. I preferred a book.
So a cuddly toy is not going to help any part of me now, not even the child part. The cuddly toy example is a very basic one, but it's representative of some more complex dynamics about inner child work for me. Some approaches don't fit with me. I think it's important for me to be aware of things like that, because it helps me understand what works for me and what doesn't.
This is why I don't see my therapist as a mother figure or caregiver. I need my therapist to be an ally. I don't want my therapist to direct the therapy, tell me what to do or push me, I want her to facilitate me finding my own way. I don't want her to hold me (literally or figuratively), I want her to hold the space around me and let me be in it. I'm always going to trust myself more than anyone else, and it's better to work with that rather than against it.
So if I do any inner child work of any kind, I need to bear this in mind. What might be needed by one person doing inner child work could feel smothering or disempowering to me. It might actually feel invalidating. I often feel a lot of frustration at some things that are talked about, and I'm starting to think that's not because there's anything wrong with them or wrong with me. It's that they aren't right for me.
That gives me a reference point for thinking more about what has been said in this thread. It's so useful to have these different viewpoints on inner child work. I'll be back...
Even if I had had decent parenting, I would probably never have been a puppies and princesses type child, or even much of a hugs and kisses child. I remember someone giving me a teddy bear when I was very little and even at the time I didn't see the point of it. I think that was my personality and not trauma related, I've heard a lot of people saying that a cuddly toy was one of their few comforts as an abused child. I preferred a book.
So a cuddly toy is not going to help any part of me now, not even the child part. The cuddly toy example is a very basic one, but it's representative of some more complex dynamics about inner child work for me. Some approaches don't fit with me. I think it's important for me to be aware of things like that, because it helps me understand what works for me and what doesn't.
This is why I don't see my therapist as a mother figure or caregiver. I need my therapist to be an ally. I don't want my therapist to direct the therapy, tell me what to do or push me, I want her to facilitate me finding my own way. I don't want her to hold me (literally or figuratively), I want her to hold the space around me and let me be in it. I'm always going to trust myself more than anyone else, and it's better to work with that rather than against it.
So if I do any inner child work of any kind, I need to bear this in mind. What might be needed by one person doing inner child work could feel smothering or disempowering to me. It might actually feel invalidating. I often feel a lot of frustration at some things that are talked about, and I'm starting to think that's not because there's anything wrong with them or wrong with me. It's that they aren't right for me.
That gives me a reference point for thinking more about what has been said in this thread. It's so useful to have these different viewpoints on inner child work. I'll be back...