Or am I making something out of nothing?
Not when there’s already sexual abuse in play.
It’s like, normal parents wipe their children’s mouths and stick their fingers inside them (to pull out things that don’t belong, clear a choking hazard, check for injuries after a faceplant, etc.). They’re
not doing it sexually, or as any kind of foreplay or grooming.
People who are sexually abusing their kids? Will also stick their fingers in their kids mouths. Except now it’s got a sexual component. :sick:
At what age should parent stop sticking their fingers in their kids mouth? Just like bathing, it’s not the age that makes something abusive. It’s the person doing it, and why they’re doing it.
If your dad was getting off on bathing you? It doesn’t matter if you’re 2 days old, 2yo, 12yo, or 20yo. It’s sexual abuse. The age isn’t what makes it abusive. He was what made it abusive.
One of the reeeeeeeeally hard things for my son is sorting out what’s abuse, vs what’s a normal thing being done by an abuser? Because normal people make a sandwich. It’s not abusive to make a sandwich. Except my ex can make that an abusive experience (and often did... like not feeding my son for a week and then forcin him to stand and watch my ex make a sandwich and eat it). I’ve watched my kid trying to parse other people cooking/eating in various ways, since then. Mostly black and white thinking style, like this age = okay, that age = wrong. Or since it’s not abusive when other people do it, it wasn’t abusive when his dad did it, or it’s always wrong to make sandwiches, or eat in front of others. It doesn’t work that way. And it doesn’t help that not every time my ex made a sandwich was it abusive. Sometimes, it was just a sandwich.
So you can’t even say, just because an abuser does it, that it’s abuse. The black & white, something or nothing, just doesn’t work. You have to actually look at their intent. Which is a really gross, really hard thing, to do. To wrap your head around THEY were doing this, for this reason. It’s faaaaaaaaar more attractive (from both personal experience, and observation) to stick outside rules on it. To stay 50’ away from what they actually wanted was to hurt you, to groom you, to make you afraid, to think this was normal, to blame yourself, etc.... that it was a deliberate act against you.... and then not jump 50’ back again, and decide that all versions of that act -by anyone- are a deliberate act against anyone. It’s a very, very hard thing to stay in the middle of that thought, and not leap to the extremes of either end, 50 feet away.