It’s less of an idiotic statement than a flashing neon sign of how DEEP in it you are with trauma stuff (avoidance, minimization, blaming yourself, secrets and shame and lessons learned in trauma, core beliefs and cognitive distortions, attempting to understand/explain/relate, etc., etc., etc.), that things are sooooooooo muddied it
feels right that there’s no difference between you & your abuser. That whole feelings aren’t facts & emotions don’t logic so hot, but my head is so busy trying to protect me, that it’s not challenging these feelings, but jumping down the rabbit hole and seconding/reinforcing them.
Hence the whole it’s reeeeally worth bringing to your T, because there is a whoooooole helluva lotta stuff to unpack & untangle.
Let’s revisit, this, though…
But I guess I was looking for an explanation for why he was the way he was. I think I found it, to some extent anyway. I know it doesn’t excuse the things he did. I know that. But also, doesn’t it kinda? If that’s all you’ve known?
“Why”, when you’re talking about certain subjects, gets pretty dicey.
Because the attempt to understand? Is NOT a bad thing, BUT it naturally attempts to relate / draw parallels… that, when one is in a certain headspace… don’t reeeeeeally exist / are NOT the same. But? Do feel the same.
((Like, why was I raped? Because I was wearing a pretty dress!!! (Or said hello, or was out late, or a 1,000 other things. But let’s stick with the dress). Well, I can understand someone not being able to control themselves, because I don’t have perfect control, either…. So, I’m no different from them… Which means it’s really not their fault they lost control, as it was a reeeally pretty dress, and my choice to wear it. I won’t wear pretty dresses anymore. That way rapists will be able to control themselves. It’s as much my fault as theirs. It’s all my fault, really. No one has perfect control, all the time. Might as well have given a diabetic a cookie. What was I thinking? I should apologize for my part. I was so stupid. How could I have done this to myself?))
If you picked a different kind of trauma, that doesn’t have its claws in you, you could undoubtedly have exceptional boundaries with “Why”. Describing the various subtypes, what brings most people to it, Venn diagrams of this, that, and the other. Etc. etc. etc. etc.
Here’s where I hope bombings are not in your history
((Like, there are 3 standard bomber profiles. Political, Ideological, Revenge/Retaliatory/Injustice Collectors. In each of those three, there dozens of variations, like suicide bombers are nearly all young adults in profound grief/bereavement OR radicalised teens looking to be a part of something bigger than themselves. Meanwhile across all of those dozens there’s also a venn/trifecta/cocktail of power disparity, mental illness, & malic… ET CETERA. People are complicated, and lives are complicated, to in order to accurately assess/describe/understand? Things get complicated.))
All kinds of “why” (when it’s not your own history) that even if/when you relate to components of those profiles/histories? STAY complicated. Cognitive distortions don’t attempt to warp them, or oversimplify, or dismiss them. They doesn’t attack your sense of self, nor your perception of the world (what you believe is right/wrong, etc.). Et Cetera. The WHY is something you maintain perfect boundaries with.
But?!? When it’s your own trauma history, and indivudals in play? Things get dark fast.
I hope that parses? I’m really not at my best right now, or I could be both clearer AND more concise! >.<