Did the debate bring anything substainially new to light?
I think that it became very clear that Trump is campaigning on 'the sky is falling'. He had a lot to say about how America was a disaster, how our trade agreements were a disaster, how people who didn't know how to work with money (politicians) were making decisions about money...
But he only directly answered three questions, I think. He changed the subject frequently. When asked how he was going to get the businesses who have left America to come back (since this is one of his major stump points), his answer was something like 'we never should have let them go in the first place'. Holt asked him I think 2 more times to answer the question, and he just....didn't.
He kept trying to cling to some things that clearly he'd planned as his sound bites, but they tended to demonstrate a really conspicuous lack of knowledge about our history in the middle east.
Hillary was funny. I think that might have been the major revelation. She debated really well - delivered her message, found the right moments to poke holes in Trump, didn't over-do it. Only got sucked into a food fight with him once, maybe twice. But she had some very funny moments, and I don't think that's what people expect to see in her. Basically, she was a whole lot more likable than she's been painted to be. And Trump was less charismatic than he's been in the past. He was struggling.
Substantial? I don't know if Trump's trickle down economics proposal has been quite as fully articulated as it was tonight. His whole message kind of added up to, 'give more control over the nation's wealth to the people who know how to use it (the rich), and that will fix our debt and bring back jobs.' But he was playing defense most of the night. Got nailed on not releasing his financials. He also pretty much said that his solution to the trade agreements was to tax the f*ck out of every nation that wants to import. That's really not a smart move.
Hillary got a little tired towards the end. She was fumbling a little over what her approach would be to deal with ISIS, and she wasn't very good on the cyber-security question. Neither of them really stepped up to the plate on race - they both played it pretty conservative there, except for Trump denying that search and frisk had been ruled unconstitutional.
I think minds should have been changed. Trump had very few actual plans that he could articulate. He's put time in on the economic plan, so he could talk about it, but had no comeback for the fact that a number of independent analysts have been critical of it. He had nothing to say about what the actual plan should be, re: ISIS. He just looked like he didn't know what he was doing.
The people who are strongly anti-Hillary will likely not change their minds, based on anything. But fence-sitters should have been impressed with her.
That's my sloppy overview. Curious what others think.