• We are a multilingual website again. Read the notice about this.
  • Understand AI use at MyPTSD: all AI use is explained in our AI help page. AI use is by choice here. It exists if you want it, but does nothing unless you choose to use it.

Sex Offender As Therapist?!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think another possibility is that regardless of how a sex offender student was admitted, the school could be sued by the student for kicking them out mid-program-------especially if there are no formal rules on the books for not admitting sex offenders.

Damn, if I had tonnes of money id expose these schools for what they are! It would be a major scandal for not only the schools but the professional organizations.

Regardless I thank you for posting this as I will always do background checks on health practitioners from here on out.
 
regardless of how a sex offender student was admitted, the school could be sued by the student for kicking them out mid-program-------especially if there are no formal rules on the books for not admitting sex offenders.

I am not sure, but I think that sex offenders have a right to earn a degree, no matter what the discipline. So, even if they had done a proper background check prior to his matriculation, I don't think they could have rejected his application due to his sex offender status.

The problem then would be: How could he possibly complete the degree requirements given his supposed ineligibility for participation in the required clinical practicum? And here's where it gets ugly.

He applied and was accepted to a private university. Any school counselor of integrity - and, for that matter, whoever interviewed him face-to-face for the program - should have looked him straight in the eye and said, "We would like to have you but, I must inform you that a clinical practicum is a requirement for graduation. Will you be able to legally participate in the practicum?"

Assuming the best of the college, if they did this and he answered, "No," they should have denied him entrance, for no other reason than because it would do him a grave disservice to allow him matriculate while knowing, from the outset, that he could not possibly complete the degree requirements.

On the other hand, if he answered, "Please allow me to matriculate, and I will cross that bridge when I come to it. I hope to be off the sex offender registry by that point," then what could they do? All of these licensing boards, etc., keep telling me that they must be 'fair' to him, must give him a chance, must let him be heard. Could the university say no at this point? After all, it is the licensing board that decides whether he can practice under supervision - not the university, right?

My best guess as to what he actually did, based upon what he told my mother and what I would do myself, if I were trying to weasel into the program: He applied for a number of programs, checked the magic box on the applications that states that, yes, he is a convicted felon, and then waited to see who would accept him. He was accepted by three universities. When asked about the practicum bit, he answered, "Yes, I am concerned, but I must tell you that I am not striving to earn a counseling license. I'm studying in order to better myself, with the hope that, one day, I will write self-help books for those in my situation. I have the money to pay all of my fees and tuition out-of-pocket. I would like to matriculate and study for as long as I can. I hope to be off the sex offender registry by time the practicum requirement comes up; if so, I will particpate. If not, then, I will petition for a substitute, something I can do in lieu of the practicum. And, if neither option becomes available to me, I am willing to step aside, transfer to another suitable program, or even drop out and be happy that I have been blessed to progress this far."

That, my friends, is how I believe he got accepted. And then, once it was time for the practicum, his professors said, "We should give him a chance, vouch for him with the licensing board. We know him and he's a nice guy."

Ben
 
Yes, schools can indeed reject students who fail a background check, of which being a sex offender would be an automatic fail. They are standard, at least in my state, for a variety of programs. It is based on the fact that schools do not want to waste precious space educating someone who is unemployable as the places their graduates work will indeed require background checks.

Schools can indeed reject applicants based on sex offender status. "Sex offender" is not a protected status where they have a right to get into any program just because that's what they want. Schools have no obligation to enroll these people when program requirements explicitly state that a background check must be passed before enrollment.
 
Last edited:
Eve, this is sure news to me. Does this information only apply to public univerisites?

Also, I don't recall any of my university applications ever stating that a background check would be required or performed.

What state are you living in, may I ask? I'm embarrassed to admit that I don't recognize your flag.

Ben
 
The practicum requires the student practitioner to provide a certain number of one-on-one mental health counseling hours, and a certain number of group/couples counseling hours.

I don't know the restrictions in his state, but I do know that federal guidelines consider counseling of this nature to be inappropriate employment for a sex offender.

I would think it might be appropriate for him to gain licensure to treat sex offenders, but he is not interested in such work.

Ben
 
Hi Joey,

Yes, the laws vary from state to state. And, in some states, such as California, the licensing board guidelines go so far as to state that there are no issues that automatically disqualify an applicant; every application is decided on a case-to-case basis.

So, my understanding is that he was not legally prohibited from seeking a graduate degree in counseling, or a license for that matter. I also believe the universities were not legally prohibited from accepting him into this program.

Regarding his participation in a practicum, my understanding is that he would need a supervising clinician, and such supervision requires an application to the licensing board.

When I found out he had participated in a practicum, and had formed a practice under supervision after graduation, I informed his state licensing board. Within 24 hours, his temporary license and practice were suspended. A complete inquiry was completed and he was called to a disciplinary hearing. I was not privy to their decision, but I know he did not regain the right to practice under supervision. Without those hours, he can never gain licensure.

So, although what he did was technically not forbidden by law, it was always risky because there was little chance he could ever become licensed.

Ben
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Donation drives

2026 Donation Goal

Goal
$1,800.00
Earned
$910.00
This donation drive ends in
0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds
  50.6%

Trending content

Featured content

Back
Top Bottom