I've been thinking about this thread a lot. (bulldog philosopher gene expressing itself, I'm just going to keep worrying the thing until it is good and dead...:eek:)
So here is what I've come up with:
"Love" and "Hate" are both really really imprecise terms.
Both can be actions (as in doing "self-love" or "self-care" activities, or in "self-harming") so they can describe and categorize behaviors.
Both can also name a variety of feelings of attraction and repulsion. This is especially confusing because "love" strictly speaking is not an emotion that I can tell. What people are usually meaning when they talk about love is "attraction" or "lust" or "affection" or "fascination" or something like that. "Hate" however, might be an emotion. "Disgust" is certainly an emotion. "Anger" and "loathing" are emotions.
Both can name psychological biases toward their objects, and as such indicate a certain disposition of how we will feel about the object in positive or negative ways.
Both can name commitments or habitual actions toward their objects - how we intend to/habitually treat them, regardless of how we feel at the time.
Reading back over these posts I get the sense that there is not one of these meanings that is predominant...
@ raven, Sorry you got triggered badly.:( What poor excuses for adults you were surrounded by. This:
leads me to wonder about boundary issues between you and your folks, and how the context might have made it really really difficult to draw those boundaries for yourself. You, after all weren't (strictly speaking) in the military. Your parent was. So yours was a military family, but you were just a kid. My dad was a hospital administrator - that didn't make me a "hospital kid" or "medical." I come from a family with lots of military in it, so I know how people talk about this, and it does blur the lines and it IS thought of as an identity - which in some ways it is - and it is a specific sub-culture. Old news to you, I'm sure, but the phrase was striking to me...