• We are a multilingual website again. Read the notice about this.
  • Understand AI use at MyPTSD: all AI use is explained in our AI help page. AI use is by choice here. It exists if you want it, but does nothing unless you choose to use it.

Childhood Wife Supporting Pedophile Husband.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lucycat

Sponsor
'Virtuous' paedophile who is aroused by girls reveals why his wife has stood by him | Daily Mail Online

This wife has just been interviewed on UK TV telling how she believes everything her husband tells her and she feels children are safe around him. I found this newspaper article that rather gives a different perspective. I think that she is deluded and in denial.

I feel really angry about the whole thing and it was very difficult watching - I might add I had not chosen the TV programme and was not in a position to turn it off. I could have left the room but instead the Internet did me a favour and crashed - so I missed the end anyway.
 
I ended up reading it and personally I think he's being honest. ( I can't believe I said that)
He's opening up a can of hell going public with this yet he is. How hard would it be for him to just deny it out and out yet he is not only telling something that is incredibly hard and could cause him death threats but is telling things that happened in his family that many on here can't face at all. I do hope that he really is trying to help other people. This is just my opinion and nothing more.
 
I read it. The continuous use of the phrase "virtuous paedophile" is a bit much. The media is definitely trying to evoke a specific reaction. Let me preface this by saying that I have worked with child victims of sexual abuse for years as a part of my career and, as a result, have also worked with the perps.

With that being said, I think that:
(1) It is even more alarming if he is a former a teacher.
(2) It is worth noting that if his family did have a history of incestual child abuse as the article claims, then that is likely a contributing factor to his warped sexual preferences.
(3) I do not think that pedophilia is genetic or inherited, but continuing the cycle of sexual abuse is a very real thing.
(4) If he is so virtuous and avoidant of actually perping on little girls, he should NOT have fostered or allowed his wife to even consider fostering any children in his home. Just because you aren't physically sexually abusing the children doesn't make it okay to enjoy having them around to enjoy them (in more ways than one).
(5) "He told the newspaper he does not seek out pornography involving children when he masturbates, but added he doesn't 'beat himself up' if he does watch scenes involving young people." NO.
(6) A foster daughter developed "false memories" three years after living in the home of him sexually abusing her. I pray that a thorough investigation was done to determine what really happened there.

I think it is admiral if he has those urges and has never acted on them. But not acting on them should include limiting contact with children. I think allowing foster children (especially of the gender and age he prefers) is acting on his urges, whether or not there was any sexual contact. And he mentions sexual games with his 5- and 7-year-old female cousins when he was 12. In some states, including mine, 12 is old enough to be considered a perp in some parts of the system. So I think that is another instance where he acted on his urges. So while there may be benefits to his telling his story and connecting "non-offending pedophiles", I do not consider him non-offending at all.
 
I read it. The continuous use of the phrase "virtuous paedophile" is a bit much. The media is defini...
I missed where it said foster kids...I agree with that. He should NEVER be allowed them.
And I also had issue with his "young people" reference. Not to mention he calls himself Christian yet admits to porn use. Kind of talking out of both sides of his mouth but that's nothing new.

That said...his chances of being anywhere near kids at this point are slim to none. He has outed himself.
 
I have to say a 12 year old isn't the same as an adult. I'm guessing that's what he means.
For sure not the same. Just a point that some people may not be aware of is that (in some states) Child Protective Services (or your state's version) can designate a 12-year-old as a perpetrator of sexual abuse. Therefore, CPS can validate a 12-year-old for sexual abuse the same way a 40-year-old can be validated for sexual abuse. Anyone 11 and under can't even be categorized or entered in the system as a perp, only as a victim, no matter the circumstance.
 
I wasn't going to read it at first but then decided to.
I absolutely cannot believe the wife stands by him and supports him.
As a survivor of incest/csa it makes me sick that fostering children would even be considered.
One sick individual and i cant believe he has been given 'tv' or 'newspaper' time. Im also so annoyed ay myself for reading the article.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Donation drives

2026 Donation Goal

Goal
$1,800.00
Earned
$910.00
This donation drive ends in
0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds
  50.6%

Trending content

Featured content

Back
Top Bottom