I suppose that the shootings at the Empire State building got such huge (world wide) press coverage because it happened in a tourist hot spot, compared with the other locations that Catjudo highlighted.
On August 5, seven people (including the shooter) were killed at a Sikh temple in Wisconsin. On August 13 three people, including a police officer, were shot and killed near Texas A&M University.
However that just goes to show that mass shooting in the US are more prevalent than get reported globally.
If people were more balanced they could own a gun but never feel the need to use it because they would naturally respect themselve more and therefore other life forms...and if they started using their brains and learn how to communicate effectively, they wouldn't feel the need to resort to violence...but that's a pipedream.
Whilst I appreciate the sentiment of this comment, it doesn't make much sense to me. Why would you own a gun, if you didn't intend to use it?
I guess perhaps that is where the difference lies, with different cultures. Guns are not something I was brought up with, and the thought of owning a gun or even feeling like I
should own one, or wished that I
could own one, for self defence or for the need to protect my property or my family frankly scares the shit out of me.
I'm in the UK, and yes there is gun 'crime' here. There will always be gun 'crime', anywhere/everywhere in the world. That is crimes committed illegally at gun point or criminals killing each other with guns due to disagreements. And also, whatever laws you place on society, occasionally guns will fall into the wrong hands and mass shootings will occur.
However, in the UK, the average person cannot get a license to carry a gun, certainly not a handgun. To obtain a firearm license in the UK, you have to prove legitimate sporting, collecting, or work-related reasons for ownership. Shot guns and rifles can be owned legally for the previous reasons stated. Self defence is not a valid reason to own a firearm in the UK. People who own a Firearm Certificate are also limited as to how much ammunition they can buy. Firearms also have to be stored in a locked cabinet when not in legitimate use. Any person holding a Firearm or Shotgun Certificate must comply with strict conditions regarding such things as safe storage. These storage arrangements are checked by the police before a licence is first granted, and on every renewal of the licence. There are also other criteria that need to fulfilled before a firearms license will be granted.
Admittedly, I haven't lived in the US (only visited), but I really don't see why similar laws to the UK could not be enforced in the US. Giving people who have legitimate needs to own a firearm a license to own and use that weapon, for hunting, pest control, sport ect, but relinquishing the ownership for the average citizen, who has no need to shoot anyone or any thing.
the police shot him 10 times and injured 9 other people. What are we going to do take the police's guns away too???
Yes!! The majority of Police in the UK don't carry guns. If the Police come across a situation that involves firearms, they will call in a specialist team. Yes, it does work, because firearms incidents are a minority, because of the laws already defined.
I still don't know all the facts regarding the Empire State shooting, but it seemed from the off, that the Police themselves had caused the majority of injuries to civilians, which just goes to show how much damage a gun can cause in the wrong (untrained) hand.
I accept that guns will always fall into the wrong hands. I accept that no matter where in the world, mass shootings will occur for all sort of reasons.
But for the average Joe/Jane in the street to own, carry and be prepared to use a lethal weapon in anger scares me. Seriously scares me. I see no need for the average citizen to own a gun.