I just wanted to come back to update and say things are OK now with me and my therapist. The whole thing has been really intense and has opened up a lot of difficult things I'd rather not look at. I'm exhausted. Thanks again to people in this thread for helping me through this.
There's something that has struck me very much about it all, and I wanted to say it here because I think it's relevant to thinking about attachment. I'm a bit wary because I don't want to spark a debate about the value of different types of therapy. I'm only saying there's a type of therapy that suits me, other types of therapy might suit others, and the important thing for each individual is to be in the type of therapy that works for you and moves you forward.
My therapist took responsibility for what had happened between us, and I know that was genuine and not a therapeutic ploy, or even putting aside her own perceptions in order to help me by seeing things from my position. She had been concerned about it, and apologised, and wanted to explain, hear my point of view and validate me for being angry with her. I didn't even agree with her completely, because I think I had some responsibility too. I had misunderstood and not explained how I was starting to feel until it had escalated. She also related it directly to trauma-related responses, and I did agree with that.
Her viewpoint, as I understand it, is that I'm vulnerable because of doing trauma work and trying to deal with the reactions, and can't be expected to respond rationally or articulately to things that are unclear and seem threatening. I'm so relieved and grateful for this. I can see it as another way of looking at it, and I think it's valid. If she had taken the approach of challenging my responses, asking me to re-evaluate them, or seeing them as an issue to deal with in any way, I would have felt that was valid too, but I would have felt flawed, overwhelmed and still worried about our relationship.
Someone else might have responded well to being challenged on their role in what happened - that kind of evaluation, accountability and structure might be exactly what would make them feel safe. Being challenged (gently and in the right way) might also be appropriate for me in some situations, if I was stuck in a pattern of behaviour that I had no awareness of. For me with this, though, compassion and genuine sympathy were what I needed to feel safe again. I was actually able to be open and specific about some of the shame that it had been bringing up.
I'm definitely not saying everyone should have my kind of therapy, which is based around compassion and trust in the client. I'm sure not everyone would want to, or would do well with it. My therapist isn't perfect either, I just don't talk here about various upsets that I have to navigate with her but which are not so fundamentally threatening to me.
I can't believe I'm saying this, but I think this does go back to the idea of "repair" being important in the therapeutic relationship. So conflicts and tensions aren't actually the end of the world? Really? It does mean things get discussed that wouldn't be touched on otherwise. If everything was going well all the time, there'd be no need to look at dynamics in the therapeutic relationship that are mirroring other dynamics, other experiences and other relationships. Writing that, I think "Ugh, I so don't want to do this, although I know I must". The nicer part of it is that it has brought confirmation and reassurance that we do share the same basic beliefs about healing and that she does trust me. It has been good to have that.
And now she's on holiday and I have to deal with a break! Wah! Talk about attachment issues being tested at the moment...