I recall now that she said something else when I last saw her, and for some reason I omitted it above. It was on that last visit when she showed up at my place to collect something the day before her trip, which was after the melt down on the street. She said:
“I love you dearly. It’s just the extent of the help I need, and that I am not getting, is what makes me so very upset. I am totally helpless.”
It seems to me now that she was trying to justify or at least explain her melt down. But in turn I ask myself whether she has a legitimate point under the unacceptable expression of it, or whether I should not be trying to empathise with such behaviour.
I Googled around the subject and found this:
The men who leave their spouses when they have a life-threatening illness
Is that me? Or is she the dependent, trying to pull me into a co-dependent role?
Either way, once again, I am being accused by her of abandonment, neglect and selfishness. I don't think the issue is that I am running around her and controlling her like a co-dependent would, because I am not.
I think the issue is that I am keeping a certain amount of distance, and she doesn't like it precisely because she is unable to depend on me. And she wants to, because she is unable to function, is incapacitated by diagnosed illnesses, has run out of money and continues to be stalked by her attacker who has already struck once and is facing criminal charges. Meanwhile I am healthy and relatively wealthy. And I continue to mention to her about my need for self-care.
I am still listening to
Codependent No More by Melody Beattie. An issue I have with a lot of psych books like this one is that they deal with extremes such as full-blown personality disorders reserved for the minority with psychiatric cases rather than the
traits of problematic behaviour that we may all have from time to time.
Consequently I do not fit Beattie's pure definition of a co-dependent because I don't tick all her boxes. But I am willing to accept that in my personality I like to give people friendly, heartfelt and helpful advice when I can, as a kind of love-language; I recognize that is one of the traits of co-dependency and I will try to reign it in.
Trouble is, Beattie says it is better to instead ask what the addict needs, rather than risk telling them what to do. Based on my experience I can already hear my friend's reply to my question about what she needs: "Everything."
Based on my experience of her, I expect she'd say she wants me to bankroll her and have her move back in while she continues to be unemployed, dump her complaining on me, blame me, criticize me, and have ongoing meltdowns that are allegedly my fault.
Yet I feel bound to her like my own flesh and blood. Thousands of hours of laughter, hugging, affection, good company, joyous life experiences and genuine loving are not something I have accounted for here. They are a large part our story.
Question. How do I explain to her that what I am doing is not abandonment, neglect, stinginess, cruelty or selfishness but in fact an attempt at what the literature calls "loving detachment" ?