if I purposely allow others to bulldoze them, I have a responsibility there, and only taking the victim's stance is ignoring my responsibility. If others bulldoze them after I set them, then it shows me very clearly the type of person I am dealing with, but if I never set them then I'm not making a clear statement to myself or others about how I desire to be treated and can never know who will be supportive in my life because I didn't have the courage to set them and placed people-pleasing over my wellbeing.
Yes and no. We have yes some responsibility (or more agency) in what we have to define to ourselves and what we’re okay or not for. Responsibility stricto sensu has to do with actions that are done, not statements before. If you ask someone to kill you, even if it was filmed and your "consent" validated, if the person does it then they’ll be imprisoned for murder. Because regardless of what you might have said, there are things that at least in terms of justice you cannot give away.
So if you fail to set your own boundaries out of being people-pleasing, it doesn’t mean you are an avenue for abuse and that it justifies being abused. Sure, being able to enforce your conditions will hopefully keep these people as far as possible. But it’s still their
responsibility to be decent.
What do you mean by forcing someone else's boundary?
Very simply, someone manifests a boundary or a limitation, and you bulldoze over. Like someone tells you stop yelling at me, and you continue. Or, I do not consent, to this, and you continue. Now, depending on what it is and how big it is it might not be an immense deal, but generally when someone manifests a clear problem with something decent response is to step off and respect that.
The way I am understanding is that we are who we are and that's not inherently affecting anyone, because people will take you or leave you no matter how you choose to act...and people that want to be in our lives will work to respect our boundaries unless it's a boundary they're not comfortable with and vice versa...but it affects us if we're not being true to ourselves and actually I'm seeing it's sort of manipulation to only act in regard to other people's feelings...like attempting to control the situation and other's actions to eliminate our sense of discomfort/guilt. I can see how this is natural to survive in an abusive environment, but maintaining this dynamic in our life after trauma seems like staying in survival mode/setting us up for the same types of relationships.
And here I realize I wasn’t super clear. It is true that in certain ways of gaslighting, it’s possible to use your own "boundaries" as means of control. Like, if you don’t behave like this <insert some demand that the other person generally cannot meet> then I’ll walk away. To work out boundaries need to be enforceable. And modulated. It’s evident that if you have the boundary "I do not accept to be yelled at", at some point if you yell at each other, normally your response will vary Probably you’ll just state I don’t want to be yelled at and I’m asking you to calm down, I’m gonna have a walk and we’ll talk about this another time. Now if the person is scary and screams relentlessly at you it might just be reasonable to walk away. That’s modulation.
Sometimes the person cannot meet the demand but are of good will, then you can try to negotiate something and define patterns to work it out. In that case, you can by example plan how to manage a specific trigger you know you cannot avoid in life. Asking for an accommodation as a boundary is reasonable; weaponizing the trigger to force someone to comply into something impossible is not. Sometimes it’s not so easy to see where to draw the line.
Sometimes, demands can be unreasonable. There I wouldn’t see it as a boundary.
But in certain cases like with PTSD after DV, now I just know that there are certain kinds of yelling and certain kinds of dynamics that are just shitty the way they are and I don’t want to hit myself in trying to improve something that can, thank you I tried enough. And if the person cannot meet that reasonable demand, then my only option is literally to walk away. Even if they’re willing, even if they’re making efforts. For certain things, the only thing that counts is the results, and end of story. And it isn’t unreasonable to be rather rigid regarding to these things. It isn’t because I’m being too exigent or demanding, it’s basic safety.
I guess after trauma we get very scrambled with what is reasonable and what’s unreasonable. Stupidly high thresholds of pain and stress also don’t help finding where to draw the line. Dissociation incapacitates the congruence of these over time. Hypervigilance can drift into being controlling. There are many ways to f*ck up with boundaries. But it doesn’t mean it’s wrong to
have them. It’s important to figure where they are.