I gave a few dollars to one of my roommates to get me something at the store, but they never did and I would like my money back, but I am unsure of how I should ask for the money without coming off like a jerk. I suppose I don't feel the playing field is equal. I tend to think that I should let it go because it is just a few dollars (making excuses now) and I am not skilled yet at assertive communication and so I take the passive stance (normally) and let it go. Perhaps I am afraid of confrontation.
^The OP circumstance and dilemma is just one of so many variations on
financial transactions that it is senseless to try to explain the possible difficulties. But believe me there are a myriad of problems relating to this.
I meant to say emotional responses to financial transactions vary.
^Absolutely agree. Murders, financial abuse, extreme moments of generosity and on it goes. We are human so we are emotional.
life has taught me not to have strong attachments to things, places or money. So if it's taken away, so be it. If it comes my way, so be it.
^Wow. I'm definitely not habitating that camp. :sorry: But well done you for being so blase' about it all. :) :cautious:
I don't understand why it so important to know the difference between a loan and a gift.
^I'm not sure if you meant this as a rhetorical question or you really don't understand why it might be important?
Loans can be forgiven and gifts sometimes come with a steep emotional price.
^Yes. However
before either loans or gifts are exchanged between parties, even a discussion about the terms of the loan, the likelihood of it being forgiven etc and in the case of a gift being accepted by the recipient
before accepting?
Perhaps coming to an agreement may prevent misunderstandings in the future.
And then communicating the ongoing position of the transaction or re-negotiating seems prudent behaviour. Not simply just forget about it all. :wtf:
Surely you have noticed how many misunderstandings there are about this stuff?
In the OP's case the money was not a loan, it was a transaction, money for goods. That didn't transpire as agreed. It seems the person who then was holding the money might have thought the money was a gift? But Idk - who knows? Still very awkward and could have been avoided by the person who was handed the money giving it back... sigh.....
In most circumstances however Cypress if someone discusses a loan that's exactly what they mean. And if something is borrowed it means it is meant to be returned... and therein lays the dilemma.
I do realise that there seems to be a problem with the concept of loan with a lot of people. That's why I don't loan people property or money. Actually I have neither to give anyway so I'm a bad example. But go with me on this bc I have seen a lot of awkward, tense, arguments or 'discussions' arise from this very issue.
If it's not something I can live without, I don't give.
^Me too - of course. Goes without saying that lending money/property that one cannot live without should never be given away. The oxygen mask circumstance springs to mind there. :)