• We are a multilingual website again. Read the notice about this.
  • Understand AI use at MyPTSD: all AI use is explained in our AI help page. AI use is by choice here. It exists if you want it, but does nothing unless you choose to use it.

News Movie: Split

Status
Not open for further replies.
The problem I have with the way they have portrayed DID in the movie (or at least parts of the movie - i.e., the character with DID violently kidnaps children at the beginning of the movie and holds them captive) is that, even though this is *fiction*, it perpetuates a stereotype about mental illness and DID that we really just don't need. Hard enough to get proper care and fight the stigma that's already out there without having to deal with more.
 
I also agree with Whiteraven and perpetuating the bad guy stereotype.

As one who has studied literature, I would suggest that emerging new ways of seeing have to deal with the current stereotypes at some level. It isn't really possible to make sense to a wide audience largely uneducated in something complex without portraying and then challenging the stereotypes linked to the reality.

The best one can hope for with TV, which is made for a large audience with a 5-8th grade reading level, is some violence and gore to reel them in, some romance and drama/conflict, and then taking the stereotype apart to show how it is not accurate and that there is always more to things. But the stereotype will be there in the mix someplace.
 
Found this brilliant piece by someone with DID/MPD regarding the movie Split.

".... you teach people to fear DID. You teach people to fear me."
A Letter to Universal Pictures - Wish Dish
November 22 by Amber Wolfe

To Whom It May Concern:

Within twenty-one seconds of watching the trailer for Split during a presentation I gave, someone in my class jumped. Fear lies at the core of the various emotions you have invoked in the audience. This is not a typical psychological thriller despite the fact that mental illness plays a role. This is a horror film.

From the beginning of the trailer, the audience is terrified. Some people may close their eyes at various moments, such as when the kidnapper hazes one of the young girls, because they do not know what to expect next. The suspense and curiosity captivate the audience because they not only want to know the mystery behind the kidnapper, they want to know the mystery behind a rare diagnosis that is being heavily glorified: DID (Dissociative Identity Disorder, previously known as Multiple Personality Disorder).

However, you teach people to fear DID. You teach people to fear me.
When I presented the trailer as part of a college class, I was the one afraid. I was afraid to admit that I have DID. There are times when I am sitting in a class and I ask myself: Is my DID showing? Can people see what I have to battle every single day? Then, I wondered if my class would judge me more if they knew that I have this controversial, stigmatized disorder.

Although I do not define myself based on this mental illness alone, it is a part of my identity. I do not want a mother to watch this movie and stop letting me tutor her daughter because she fears that I will harm her daughter. I do not want an administrator from my school to watch this movie and expel me because they think I will be the reason for another school shooting. I was afraid that someone in the class may move their seat away from me after I gave this presentation.

Throughout my entire childhood, all I felt was fear. I was the one who was conditioned to be afraid of taking a five-minute walk in the dark; I was the one who was conditioned to shake, bite my nails, and grind my teeth as I sat in a cab driver’s car. I was the one who was conditioned to put up my guard in all social situations as an adult because when I was being abused as a kid, the fear took over my mind. I created my “multiple personalities” based on fear.

Through fear, you give an unrealistic portrayal of what DID truly is. The trailer teaches people that those who have a diagnosis of DID will cause trauma to others. One of Kevin’s personalities says, “He’s done awful things to people . . . And he’ll do awful things to you.” Ironically, this statement is said by his child personality. His child personality appears to be innocent through his bright yellow clothing and his high-pitched voice.

Kevin, as explained by the therapist, has twenty-three personalities. While the therapist describes some accurate symptoms of DID, you have not chosen to explain why he switches into a child personality. You also use his twenty-three multiple personalities to make his character all the more powerful. It is three against twenty-three. Kevin kidnaps three girls and holds them captive in his house as if they are prisoners.

Imagine what it would be like to feel like a prisoner as a child. Imagine what it is like to live in pain and learn about the terrible realities of the world when you are too young. Imagine what it is like to lose your innocence too quickly. When children are constantly abused, they do not know how to cope. This is why they create alters; this is why they create parts.

We need to become someone else who did not experience the abuse. We continue to dissociate into these parts as adults when we are in stressful situations.
Kevin causes trauma, but you did not show that his entire childhood was filled with trauma. Instead, you make Kevin’s child part seem funny instead of showing that people with DID feel helpless during this age. There are times now, as a twenty-two-year-old, when I dissociate into my child part. This is not empowering. Since I stopped talking around the time I was four and needed a speech therapist, I often cannot speak when I dissociate as my child part. Representations of DID like Split continue to prevent me from feeling as though I have a voice.

In the trailer, the young girls continue to look more petrified. One says, “There’s a man here. He abducted us. He’s going to kill me.” However, Kevin is largely reduced to a stereotype. He is referred to as “The Beast” later in the trailer. The voice-over says, “The world will understand now. The Beast is real.” The audience feels deeply horrified after this statement, believing that this man, this kidnapper is a monster. As a monster, he is no longer portrayed as a man. He is not portrayed as a person. By calling him “The Beast,” he is dehumanized.

As a result, all of his other characteristics are overlooked due to the negative label.

This further stigmatizes mental illness, giving the audience the idea that those with DID are evil and violent.
According to the trailer, this is a realistic depiction of DID, and the audience starts to feel the same feelings as the young girls. The intensity of emotion created by the strong imagery in the trailer makes the audience feel like they are right there with the screaming girls because the audience is supposed to empathize with them.

When I dissociated as a child, I also hallucinated a protector part: a red dragon. Am I only the Red Dragon to you? My protector part, my red dragon is powerful and strong, yet he is not dangerous. Perhaps “The Beast” protected Kevin when he was a child during the times he felt no hope. Also, I wonder who Kevin is; I wonder who Kevin was before he created twenty-three parts. We should also empathize with Kevin, but you have given us no reason to do so.

Aristotle said, “The whole is greater than the sum of its parts.” There is more to me than the Red Dragon. There is more to DID. I am a tutor. I am a feminist. I am a writer. Whether or not someone has DID, there are different aspects to everyone. Everyone presents themselves differently to people depending on the social situation. There will always be a spectrum in the ways in which people interact with the world.

Although there are layers to everyone’s personality, your trailer encourages people to see me as an evil and violent red dragon. Your trailer teaches people to overlook the goodness in me. You may wonder, if I can function most of the time now, why I do not consider myself as one person, why I still have a red dragon by my side. Then, I will ask if you would stop talking to the people who saved your childhood.

Sincerely,

The Red Dragon (but most importantly, Amber Wolfe)
 
Found this brilliant piece by someone with DID/MPD regarding the movie Split.

Wow.
i feel like someone just defended me using my language.

Representations of DID like Split continue to prevent me from feeling as though I have a voice.
yes, this. :cry:

Thank you so much for sharing, @Symphony and thank you indebtedly for writing it, Red Dragon/Amber Wolfe.
 
My husband and I have been similarly disturbed with the previews for Split.

Perhaps as further evidence of our own "complicated" reality - I actually took more offense than he did cuz he's still a bit in denial about how to "define" his situation, and *I* was more fearful that my husband would feel stigmatized. In keeping with the NATURAL complications of our situation, the primary "parts" of my husband ended up being rather indifferent about the preview (surprise!) - so I have mixed feelings -

I am SO GLAD he's not OFFENDED by the stigmatizing that's apparent, but then I'm a bit concerned that he WASN'T offended, and in fact was even intrigued by the movie, as if he's in denial (?) - which a little bit makes me worry that he could have some "wake up" in later days as the movie gains traction, to make him think our struggle is in any way similar and thus potentially re-traumatize him as if he's not a good man :(

(Which .. *sigh* .. he IS a good man, and our situation is NOT "crazy"!! - I personally believe demonic activity is more what shows up in the preview, NOT "DID" .. but it is ALSO very common in current Christian settings for DID and "demonic possession" to be intermingled in completely unreal and damaging ways which in turn causes further "spiritual abuse" by the organized church as some well-meaning people try to "cast out" an ALTER which is part of the soul and heart of the PERSON, and not some evil entity!!) ..

As a result, I am presently more affected (traumatized?) by the preview, and the full awareness of how this flick is apt to PREJUDICE people AGAINST others LIKE my husband, as if the only time anyone hears "DID" or "multiple personality" they automatically conjure images of "crazy" and my husband is NOT crazy .. he struggles for internal communication and consensus, and it might LOOK to the average person like he's mentally ill if he's in crisis (only if under high stress more than one "part" is vocalizing at the time - but usually he only allows himself to do this - let everyone have the microphone - in MY company and otherwise keeps this process private) .. *sigh*

Anyway, I have more thoughts, but suffice it to say, I'm relieved to see in this thread that I'm not the only one disturbed!

And as the WIFE in our equation, I feel I need to see the flick for "homework" if nothing else .. but I don't want to take him to see it till after I preview it first .. if it turns out the "twist" is that this guy is NOT "DID" .. then I might be in favor of us making a date night out of it. Because it could facilitate further understanding and conversation between us about the DIFFERENCE between "DID" vs. spiritual mis-diagnosis, etc. Otherwise? I'll try to guard him from its effects ...

And even as I type this, I realize I sound more like a parent trying to protect a child from all the ills out in the world - I don't think that is my intention, here, but I AM highly protective of my husband, and the mere FACT that this movie purports to be about "DID" in a significant way makes me want to RISE UP and defend my husband on the one hand, and HOLE UP to keep his situation that much MORE private - like driving us underground JUST as I'm growing keen on advocating for increased social awareness and understanding on this whole mess? *sigh*

Well, we can't control everything, I suppose ....

*still wrestling*
~WU
 
I guess what people (in general) need to realize that it is a movie not based on anything real. That movies don't mean that is how it is in reality.

Though psycopaths can have DID i suppose. But yes, it gives DID a bad name.

I can relate to BPD having a bad name. It irritates the hell out of me when people talk down about people with BPD. I seen that recently. So I can relate a bit.

But I wish people would get that its a movie, not reality. Unless stating its based on a true story, it has no reality basis to it. Even those based on a true story are changed to gain more viewers.

ETA: Dr Phil stated, a few times, that he doesn't beleive DID is real. I am sure that doesn't help either.
 
What does ETA mean in forums? I've seen it more than once.

I always knew ETA to mean "estimated time of arrival" but it never fits when people are using it on boards.
 
Dr Phil stated, a few times, that he doesn't beleive DID is real. I am sure that doesn't help either.

You're dead right.

Imagine a renowned Doctor vehemently denying Borderline Personality Disorder exists.
Completely invalidating.

It is of small comfort that his show is viewed as a joke here in Australia, and that the population of viewers here would almost immediately forget the shows' content, because its chewing gum for the brain


Feature length films (and books, i might add) have a powerful influence on people's beliefs. Think the DaVinci Code, the Bucket List, Men are From Mars and Women are from Venus, etc.)

PTSD is starting to gain traction for accuracy in films and television, thankfully.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Donation drives

2026 Donation Goal

Goal
$1,800.00
Earned
$910.00
This donation drive ends in
0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds
  50.6%

Trending content

Featured content

Back
Top Bottom