- Post starter
- #649
mumstheword
VIP Member
Yeah the diagnosis stuff. It's funny. Such controversy over c-ptsd versus no, no such thing as c-ptsd. I guess I'm gonna quote Bob Marley lyrics here, which will unimpress a whole lot of people. First of all "who feels it, knows it" and second "if the cap fits, let them wear it".
So, thoroughly unsubstantiated and non clinical. God, if clinicians were God's I'd most likely be dead by now.
Diagnosis are only as good as the people ministering them, and treating; and those receiving them, need to have their heads on enough to do the right thing with them.
I don't sit well with borderline personality disorder as a diagnosis. It just doesn't fit, but apparently, when I presented to that particular psychiatrist for the half an hour that I saw her, it was enough for her to diagnose me with it.
Watch how I was shunned when.I presented to ED after escaping the 21 year relationship with a narcy type (no I can't officially say he has narcassistic personality disorder, nor can I diagnose him with anti social personality disorder or addictive personality disorder because I'm not qualified to, but I do have an IQ of 145 and am very well read individual with an extraordinary wealth of life experience and have chin wagged with enough qualified clinicians to feel pretty confident in my sense of analyzing data and assigning criteria patterns of behaviour to those I know very well.
To me, psychiatry is still a baby science. I don't trust many clinicians in the slightest.
I do, however, identify with the rough collection of descriptive criteria that is the suggested clinical category of c-ptsd.
I identify with every word in Pete Walkers book " Complex PTSD, From surviving to thriving" so much so, that I have to take it easy reading it, as it resonates, so much, that heavy grief and a sense of familiarity tears at the edges of me and has me undone in an instant.
So, thoroughly unsubstantiated and non clinical. God, if clinicians were God's I'd most likely be dead by now.
Diagnosis are only as good as the people ministering them, and treating; and those receiving them, need to have their heads on enough to do the right thing with them.
I don't sit well with borderline personality disorder as a diagnosis. It just doesn't fit, but apparently, when I presented to that particular psychiatrist for the half an hour that I saw her, it was enough for her to diagnose me with it.
Watch how I was shunned when.I presented to ED after escaping the 21 year relationship with a narcy type (no I can't officially say he has narcassistic personality disorder, nor can I diagnose him with anti social personality disorder or addictive personality disorder because I'm not qualified to, but I do have an IQ of 145 and am very well read individual with an extraordinary wealth of life experience and have chin wagged with enough qualified clinicians to feel pretty confident in my sense of analyzing data and assigning criteria patterns of behaviour to those I know very well.
To me, psychiatry is still a baby science. I don't trust many clinicians in the slightest.
I do, however, identify with the rough collection of descriptive criteria that is the suggested clinical category of c-ptsd.
I identify with every word in Pete Walkers book " Complex PTSD, From surviving to thriving" so much so, that I have to take it easy reading it, as it resonates, so much, that heavy grief and a sense of familiarity tears at the edges of me and has me undone in an instant.
Last edited: