I can understand the usefulness of definitions of terms, but also the idea that something might come off as "not bad enough" and that might be "invalidating". Except that that form of invalidation exists in your own head, really. And, maybe, someone who feels invalidated to be told that they were "just" abused, not tortured, needs to examine their own struggles with validation.
I'm thinking that all torture is abuse, but not all abuse is torture, correct? And, maybe, when most of us hear the word "torture" we kind of go to "worst things imaginable"? So we tend to think that "torture" HAS to be worse than "abuse". But what if that's not what makes the line between the two? What if it's not severity, or damage inflicted, but just the nature of the abuse?
I'm going to say right now that the story
@joeylittle told meets both my personal concept of "torture" AND the criteria of "worst stuff imaginable". Also WAY worse than anything I've ever had to deal with. But the part of that story that makes the events "torture", to me is the systematic, calculated way the abuse was inflicted. There was time in between events to dread the next round, for one thing. And that "time to think about what's next" was part of the plan, not a coincidence. There was the continuing uncertainty. The actual physical part was really bad, but the part about being trapped, wondering what was going to happen next was bad too. And it was a calculated part of the situation. To me, that's where you cross the line. The intent isn't just to hurt someone, it's to BREAK someone, whether or not they succeed. And I don't mean "break" in the "I'm too broken for anyone to ever love me :cry:" sense. I mean it in the sense that I can best describe as wanting to kill someone's soul, regardless of what happens to their body.
What I generally tell myself, and what more or less works for me, is, it doesn't matter how you got to where you are, if it's a problem, it was bad enough. Go from there. Different things affect different people differently. You don't have to earn the right to have the problems you actually have, you just have them. But, I can very much see where it might be hard to accept "I was tortured". I still have trouble considering some of what happened to me as "abuse". Because that's something that happens to someone else and because minimizing is one of my go to survival tools. But, reluctantly, I can also see where it's useful to use the right terms and see stuff for what it actually was, what ever it was. Accuracy is a good thing, all the way around.