I know from reading posts on here that unless she gets treatment, she'll never be able to manage her symptoms properly, let alone have a healthy relationship.
Not necessarily. A lot of people with PTSD sort themselves out over time & go on to be just fine.
Granted, if you’re in a relationship and want change
now in order to be willing to stay in the relationship? Treatment is the “easy button”... both as a catalyst for change, and an oversight of a kind. Like marriage problems can be worked out without couples counseling, or not. Or they can end this marriage, but be worked out over the next few relationships, so 5 or 10 years later you would never even have had a problem to begin with if you’d married now. Or the person can keep having the same problems that ended hour marriage in every following relationship.
If behaving a certain way helped someone survive life and death trauma, that’s some pretty robust learning. While some behaviors are indeed maladaptive, and no longer useful after the trauma is over, or fitting for the situation at hand, many times, that same behavior helped someone not die. It’s different than illogical or delusional.
Bolded for total agreement.
And because, yep. There’s
also a whole lot of -or at least the potential for a whole lot of- irrational and delusional behavior. So there’s the stuff that makes sense (then, if not now) as well as the stuff that never made sense, nor makes sense, and is just f*cking wrong.
Less the difference between vigilance and hypervigilance, and more the difference between hypervigilance and paranoia, IME/IMO.
What if the danger doesn’t exist at all? Wouldn’t that make the reaction “illogical”?
I’d say yes & no.
Singing out before you enter a room?
It never even occurred to me this was a PTSD or Trauma thang until I started reading Supporters rants (Who IS it? Who the hell else would it be??? We’re the only ones here! Of course it’s me!) ...I thought it was just good manners.
But cha. Doing it because
A) so you don’t startle anyone in the room -with accompanying side effects-
B) If you’re sneaking? Someplace you “should” be able to make noise, sing out, etc... Something is seriously wrong. Threat level imminent. To what IDFK, but it’s still an all systems alert.
Yep. That’s old rules. It makes perfect sense in the military*. There are at home rules, and in the field rules, and you don’t mix the two. You’re noisy when it’s safe, and quiet when there’s danger. That’s
not illogical. It’s perfectly logical, and plain good sense. What’s
illogical is the terrorist in the loo.
So it gets a bit tangled.
Logic - (and core belief, TBH) - Noisy when it’s safe, quiet when there’s danger
Illogical - There is no danger in my bathroom, outside of the usual. (Slipping and falling, teens jerking off, naked grandparents, OMFG
what did you eat??? Etc.) Being quiet in or near the bathroom does not mean it’s about to blow up. (Literally, not figuratively, regardless of how many tuna & bean burritos are exiting at speed). Or that the house is being robbed. Et cetera.
I can accept that outside of military families most people won’t sing out, much less update their location and intent, simply as good manners. Because they’re operating out of a different rule book. Danger has never been part of their normal, so they don’t classify their behavior around it. My jumpiness and overblown responses are on me, not them. But I will be
happier, & far more relaxed, with people who are noisy when it’s safe, and quiet when fhere’s danger.
_________
* Just like the opposite makes sense in DV. When it’s noisy? There’s danger. Someone is mad/fighting/coming to get you/drunk/breaking the things you love/etc. Snort. It’s never actually occurred to me before, but I
might have gotten afraid of my ex, if he’d be
quietly abusive. Instead of a big loud angry temper tantrum throwing asshole. I have an almost impossible time taking anyone very seriously when they’re making a racket.