- Post starter
- #229
Raven
You've often referred to this list, and it is obviously important and significant to you. I had a closer look just now, and I relate to absolutely everything, and I agree.
The question is, how does one go about it from here? If I want to achieve what is on the list, how will I get there?
As you said in your post:
I agree with you that one has to find the 'simpler' way, the path of least resistance. One has to apply Occam's razor. And there I think individual differences come in to play. I disagree with you about the second part: 'find out why we do what we do'. I believe I've dealt with that part, I think I know why I do what I do. For me the reasons are not the issue at this point in my life; what is important is how to overcome it. Regarding the third part: 'try and fix that', I agree; I want to fix it.
And so we are back to individual differences. I have no idea how you will overcome this, how you will fix it.
This list describes a person in relation to others, i.e. one can't achieve this on one's own. You can't be 'understood' or 'noticed' etc. on your own. There is another person (or people, ideally) in the equation. And therefore, I think the sequence is important: when one can stand in relation to others, then one can start working towards being understanding and understood, for example. But this means that one has to BE in relationship.
For me it means looking at my attachment difficulties first. I have the ability to make friends, and keep them. In my twenties I was extremely sociable and had a wide circle of friends. But I also realise that there was always a huge divide, and that I could never be described by any of these adjectives in relation to my friends, because of the distance I imposed - due to attachment problems. For this reason, I have become almost reclusive. Not because people are awful, but because of the strain I experience. People on this forum have criticised Facebook, for various reasons. I love Facebook, for it is the only way in which I can stay in contact with many friends from my past, albeit in a very artificial way thanks to the public relations tool that Facebook essentially is. I could not handle being in close contact with the same people.
My focus on attachment on this thread is the result of a very long process of analysing my particular difficulties. I know that if I spend the next ten years of my life working on my self-esteem, and skills for understanding and being understood etc etc, it will not solve one iota of my attachment problems. On the other hand, if I could resolve some of my attachment problems, it will go a long way towards enabling me to experience many of those things.
We each have to approach this beast from the angle or perspective where we find ourselves. How do you think you can or want to achieve this?
You've often referred to this list, and it is obviously important and significant to you. I had a closer look just now, and I relate to absolutely everything, and I agree.
The question is, how does one go about it from here? If I want to achieve what is on the list, how will I get there?
As you said in your post:
It seems far more simple to find why we do what we do and try and fix that rather than fit in some diagnosis
I agree with you that one has to find the 'simpler' way, the path of least resistance. One has to apply Occam's razor. And there I think individual differences come in to play. I disagree with you about the second part: 'find out why we do what we do'. I believe I've dealt with that part, I think I know why I do what I do. For me the reasons are not the issue at this point in my life; what is important is how to overcome it. Regarding the third part: 'try and fix that', I agree; I want to fix it.
And so we are back to individual differences. I have no idea how you will overcome this, how you will fix it.
This list describes a person in relation to others, i.e. one can't achieve this on one's own. You can't be 'understood' or 'noticed' etc. on your own. There is another person (or people, ideally) in the equation. And therefore, I think the sequence is important: when one can stand in relation to others, then one can start working towards being understanding and understood, for example. But this means that one has to BE in relationship.
For me it means looking at my attachment difficulties first. I have the ability to make friends, and keep them. In my twenties I was extremely sociable and had a wide circle of friends. But I also realise that there was always a huge divide, and that I could never be described by any of these adjectives in relation to my friends, because of the distance I imposed - due to attachment problems. For this reason, I have become almost reclusive. Not because people are awful, but because of the strain I experience. People on this forum have criticised Facebook, for various reasons. I love Facebook, for it is the only way in which I can stay in contact with many friends from my past, albeit in a very artificial way thanks to the public relations tool that Facebook essentially is. I could not handle being in close contact with the same people.
My focus on attachment on this thread is the result of a very long process of analysing my particular difficulties. I know that if I spend the next ten years of my life working on my self-esteem, and skills for understanding and being understood etc etc, it will not solve one iota of my attachment problems. On the other hand, if I could resolve some of my attachment problems, it will go a long way towards enabling me to experience many of those things.
We each have to approach this beast from the angle or perspective where we find ourselves. How do you think you can or want to achieve this?