So what...let's blame anyone except George Zimmerman, is that it? I have said before that I feel the prosecution didn't do its job properly. And while I am iffy about her calling Zimmerman a murderer, the fact remains that he killed Trayvon Martin. Perhaps "killer" would've been a more appropriate term. Martin didn't kill himself nor was he killed by a third party and he certainly didn't die of natural causes...Zimmerman killed him. How else is someone supposed to state that fact?
Intothelight, I don't think anyone is saying that it's ok for African Americans to kill other African Americans or indeed for anyone to kill anyone. And I'm sure that those African Americans who kill anyone face the swift punishment of the system (as they should). But the bigger question is, what made Zimmerman assume Martin was a criminal? Yeah, ok a string of robberies in the neighbourhood? Was it the way Martin was dressed? What was he supposed to wear on a rainy night? Not only that but in Zimmerman's mind, when he got closer to Martin, it seemed to confirm for him that Martin was the criminal - what did he base his decision on, other than what Trayvon looked like...ie the fact that he was black? But, intothelight, let's say we try to separate things and take race out of this and do as you suggest and address the violence. Where does violence come from? What contributes to it? Which groups are underprivileged, and why? Are the same standards applied to everyone equally, regardless of race etc? I think you will find that they are not.