D
DancingBull
Hi All. Looking for some suggestions regarding a university issue that is really troubling me. Please don't hold back if you think I am off-base here. I need some objectivity.
I had to withdraw from a university course due to acute onset of PTSD during the term I was taking the course. The university ostensibly has this process whereby you can submit a request for financial forgiveness in order to receive a refund. The university's policy on this is in fact extremely (and in my view, intentionally) non-specific and I have found the process to be utterly non-transparent and legally reprehensible. Along with your request, you must submit "medical documentation" that addresses the following: why (generally) you were unable to complete the course; timeframe for when the problem started; and treatment course. So, I provided a doctor's note addressing the specified criteria.
The university ultimately came back with a response letter declining my request based on "lack of documentation." I can handle my request being declined. What I have an issue with is that they are basing their decision on lack of documentation when, in fact, I provided it and could certainly produce more. So, I asked for clarification regarding the decision, explaining that I am glad to provide further documentation but need to know what, specifically, is required before I turn over further private medical information.
For months now I have been getting the runaround from various people, claiming they aren't responsible for the decision and punting my request to other offices. I finally got a response this week saying the exact same information (lack of documentation) that I received months ago, and saying that the decision stands unless I can provide "additional documentation." And again they don't define what this additional documentation means.
What I feel is an extremely reasonable request for clarification is being met with responses such as "I can see that you are angry." I find that totally demeaning and distracting from the real issue. This is not about feelings, this is not personal - this is about a university that claims there's this process in place for extenuating circumstances such as these, but is in fact doing everything possible to stonewall me. And actually I am angry. I'm angry that this university may be doing this to many more students than just me, that they may not consider PTSD to be a medical problem (we all know how very untrue that is), and yes, there's the financial aspect as well, though that is very minor in comparison to my desire for justice. Not to mention they have violated my personal identifying information by sending responses intended for me to inaccurate email addresses that were never provided to them and are not associated with me in any way.
Rant over. Am I being unreasonable? Would you advise pursuing this legally? Is there any free legal service that takes up cases like these and would they have to name me in the complaint (which would be a public document, and thus, a no-go for me)?
I had to withdraw from a university course due to acute onset of PTSD during the term I was taking the course. The university ostensibly has this process whereby you can submit a request for financial forgiveness in order to receive a refund. The university's policy on this is in fact extremely (and in my view, intentionally) non-specific and I have found the process to be utterly non-transparent and legally reprehensible. Along with your request, you must submit "medical documentation" that addresses the following: why (generally) you were unable to complete the course; timeframe for when the problem started; and treatment course. So, I provided a doctor's note addressing the specified criteria.
The university ultimately came back with a response letter declining my request based on "lack of documentation." I can handle my request being declined. What I have an issue with is that they are basing their decision on lack of documentation when, in fact, I provided it and could certainly produce more. So, I asked for clarification regarding the decision, explaining that I am glad to provide further documentation but need to know what, specifically, is required before I turn over further private medical information.
For months now I have been getting the runaround from various people, claiming they aren't responsible for the decision and punting my request to other offices. I finally got a response this week saying the exact same information (lack of documentation) that I received months ago, and saying that the decision stands unless I can provide "additional documentation." And again they don't define what this additional documentation means.
What I feel is an extremely reasonable request for clarification is being met with responses such as "I can see that you are angry." I find that totally demeaning and distracting from the real issue. This is not about feelings, this is not personal - this is about a university that claims there's this process in place for extenuating circumstances such as these, but is in fact doing everything possible to stonewall me. And actually I am angry. I'm angry that this university may be doing this to many more students than just me, that they may not consider PTSD to be a medical problem (we all know how very untrue that is), and yes, there's the financial aspect as well, though that is very minor in comparison to my desire for justice. Not to mention they have violated my personal identifying information by sending responses intended for me to inaccurate email addresses that were never provided to them and are not associated with me in any way.
Rant over. Am I being unreasonable? Would you advise pursuing this legally? Is there any free legal service that takes up cases like these and would they have to name me in the complaint (which would be a public document, and thus, a no-go for me)?