Since this thread has long transitioned from the orginal post, I feel ok going on a bit of a ramble.
While at first, I wasn't agreeing with
@anthony I think I'm beginning to understand what he is getting at. I will admit the talk of Internal Family Systems has always slightly made me feel uncomfortable. And I don't completely know why.
But the comment of
@UnKnown-Self, sort of strikes a nerve. Saying read Internal Family Systems Therapy, in response to the OP's question about DID, makes it sound like the two are the same thing. From what I know, that wasn't the author's claim or intent.
And maybe some of the unease is almost jealousy? or feeling diminished? or something by hearing people who are doing IFS talk with such ease about having parts. And please understand, I'm not saying that anyone who is doing this, is doing anything wrong. It's just that as much as there seems to be a great deal of similarity there's also this jarring difference. I don't fit the model that IFS is based off of. There's no core. There's no calmly trying to get to know parts that fit into neat little categories.
And If some therapist came along seeking out our parts and trying to identify the core (ugh)... well, I would have run for one thing. For another, it would have created a lot of chaos. We don't need to fracture and dissociate more, we need less of that.
And maybe I'm being hypocritical. I say I have DID although a good chunk of the time I disbelieve it. My therapist firmly believes it but maybe I just created parts to... I dunno. She has never asked for parts but maybe some part of me was trying to be trendy. And maybe this whole thing is a pointless ramble.
But since I've gone this far, one of us, who is a child, talked to our T today. And I have no clue what she said and I am getting fed up with not knowing things. I'm tired of the holes in my life. At the same time, I am too scared or cowardly to really want to know. And that makes the whole idea of parts seem really sucky right now.